In Reply to: RE: ..and then do you sack a reviewer who gives a positive review to a poorly measuring component? posted by Doug Schneider on May 29, 2024 at 17:40:06:
corroborative reviews like TAS did back in the day. Reviewers with individualized priorities will bring up different attributes or limitations.
Two mentors were reviewers and while we enjoyed each other's company, attending concerts together when possible and all had a passion for music, we often arrived at different conclusions when hearing something new.
Today it is more common to the reviewer to cite a handful of recordings and how they fare with a DUT. How about as compared with other like components to provide some notion of reference?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- What I find largely absent today is - E-Stat 10:25:02 05/30/24 (3)
- RE: What I find largely absent today is - Doug Schneider 10:26:34 05/30/24 (2)
- I think it is a great thing - E-Stat 10:32:27 05/30/24 (1)
- RE: I think it is a great thing - Doug Schneider 15:50:10 05/30/24 (0)