|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: The correct way is... posted by Doug Schneider on May 29, 2024 at 10:31:05:
:)More seriously, I have often thought it would be good if reviewers could achieve an accreditation that they can discern a certain level of difference. Of course, the testing protocol would be an area of discussion and running the tests would be expensive. And there probably isn't much of an upside for anyone as the likely result is that components really don't sound as different as reviewers would have us believe. So, the component manufacturers won't like that and the reviewers won't like being tested (who does?) and being found less capable than they'd like. Maybe an upside would be for a progressive publication to hire those who do best and boast about it.
Edits: 05/29/24 05/29/24 05/29/24 05/29/24
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- ..and then do you sack a reviewer who gives a positive review to a poorly measuring component? - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 16:50:29 05/29/24 (5)
- RE: ..and then do you sack a reviewer who gives a positive review to a poorly measuring component? - Doug Schneider 17:40:06 05/29/24 (4)
- What I find largely absent today is - E-Stat 10:25:02 05/30/24 (3)
- RE: What I find largely absent today is - Doug Schneider 10:26:34 05/30/24 (2)
- I think it is a great thing - E-Stat 10:32:27 05/30/24 (1)
- RE: I think it is a great thing - Doug Schneider 15:50:10 05/30/24 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]