Tweakers' Asylum

• RE: Almost always. Expectation bias and any number of other things. - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 13:48:43 08/08/24 (13)
  In Reply to: RE: Almost always. Expectation bias and any number of other things. posted by Tre' on August 08, 2024 at 13:25:59

  Reading the audio data off CDs is one area of audiophilia that should be quantifiable - is the data read correctly, is it presented at the right time (jitter) and does it affect how hard the servos have to work to recover the data (power supply modulation). Tweak proponents could measure these things and prove efficacy but in the upside down audiophile world it is for the rational to disprove them. Some (many?) believe everything makes a difference and will tweak anything/everything and, perhaps, manufacturers are the same and they don't have a rational idea what they are doing and so wouldn't know how to prove anything.
  
  For full disclosure I think it obvious my expectation bias is that these things don't work so I don't try them. Thus I can't say they don't work, only that it is very unlikely they do.
  

  ---

  • RE: Almost always. Expectation bias and any number of other things. - Geoffkait 14:06:56 08/10/24 (5)
    In Reply to: RE: Almost always. Expectation bias and any number of other things. posted by 13th Duke of Wymbourne on August 08, 2024 at 13:48:43

    The polycarbonate layer is not completely transparent to the CD laser. It's only 90%. Whereas optical glass is 97% or higher. That's why some Japanese CDs sound so fabulous, SHM CDs. Super High-performance Materials. They use optical glass for the clear layer. Now, image there's a liquid spray treatment that makes the clear layer behave like optical glass. That would be news, right?
    

    ---

    • Steady on Geoff - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 16:37:46 08/15/24 (3)
      In Reply to: RE: Almost always. Expectation bias and any number of other things. posted by Geoffkait on August 10, 2024 at 14:06:56

      You almost proposed something that could be quantified in its effect on the signal reflected back to the receiver and, hence, the recovered data. I am sure a few back of the envelope calculations would show us if this is plausible or specious.
      

      ---

      • You can't escape your own reality tunnel. Nt - Geoffkait 04:45:10 08/16/24 (2)
        In Reply to: RE: Steady on Geoff posted by 13th Duke of Wymbourne on August 15, 2024 at 16:37:46

        Nt
        

        ---

        • That is a disappointingly poor response. Who deserves blah, blah blah now? (nt) - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 12:08:22 08/16/24 (1)
          In Reply to: RE: You can't escape your own reality tunnel. Nt posted by Geoffkait on August 16, 2024 at 04:45:10

          blah
          

          ---

          • Who deserves blah blah now? - Geoffkait 12:27:23 08/16/24 (0)
            In Reply to: RE: That is a disappointingly poor response. Who deserves blah, blah blah now? (nt) posted by 13th Duke of Wymbourne on August 16, 2024 at 12:08:22

            Let me think about it for a few days and I'll get back to you.
            

            ---
    • No - Story 14:26:26 08/10/24 (0)
      In Reply to: RE: Almost always. Expectation bias and any number of other things. posted by Geoffkait on August 10, 2024 at 14:06:56

      
      
      

      
      

      
      
      

      ---
  • Wow, that's a whole lotta blah blah blah. Typical of the breed. :-) Nt - Geoffkait 13:58:56 08/08/24 (6)
    In Reply to: RE: Almost always. Expectation bias and any number of other things. posted by 13th Duke of Wymbourne on August 08, 2024 at 13:48:43

    Nt
    

    ---

    • Hey - you said I was a special type of skeptic. And I thought I was atypical :( - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 15:49:01 08/08/24 (5)
      In Reply to: RE: Wow, that's a whole lotta blah blah blah. Typical of the breed. :-) Nt posted by Geoffkait on August 08, 2024 at 13:58:56

      nt
      

      ---

      • A simple (free) test - hawkmoon 10:13:57 08/09/24 (4)
        In Reply to: RE: Hey - you said I was a special type of skeptic. And I thought I was atypical :( posted by 13th Duke of Wymbourne on August 08, 2024 at 15:49:01

        Play a cd. Then put a few drops of dawn or similar on the cd, rinse and wipe dry. Play cd again. Is there a difference?
        

        ---

        • Did you ever try the tin foil trick with CDs? Nt - Geoffkait 10:33:05 08/10/24 (0)
          In Reply to: RE: A simple (free) test posted by hawkmoon on August 09, 2024 at 10:13:57

          Nt
          

          ---
        • Is it a cleaner sound? :-) nt - Geoffkait 07:26:13 08/10/24 (2)
          In Reply to: RE: A simple (free) test posted by hawkmoon on August 09, 2024 at 10:13:57

          Nt
          

          ---

          • I use Rainbow foil from May Belt - hawkmoon 04:57:47 08/11/24 (1)
            In Reply to: RE: Is it a cleaner sound? :-) nt posted by Geoffkait on August 10, 2024 at 07:26:13

            Nice!
            

            ---

            • Excellent, excellent...-(evil laughter) nt - Geoffkait 15:10:57 08/11/24 (0)
              In Reply to: RE: I use Rainbow foil from May Belt posted by hawkmoon on August 11, 2024 at 04:57:47

              Nt
              

              ---

Post a Followup:

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---