|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
76.90.100.230
In Reply to: RE: Why would you want to reduce damping factor? posted by Brian H P on February 23, 2024 at 14:38:42
You said "Tiny fractions of an Ohm don't matter." I say they do matter. They reduce the damping factor.Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
Edits: 02/24/24Follow Ups:
. . . by an infinitesimal amount. Nothing close to the 4 Ohms or more of a tube amp's output transformer.
But I like fat cables (high purity OFC) anyway, just because.
A Dyna ST-70 tube amplifier has an output impedance of .5 ohms on the 8 ohm tap. Playing a 8 ohm speaker, that would provide a damping factor of about 16.
walkstoslow has a SS Sansui from the 1970's with a damping factor of 70.
The output impedance of his Sansui is .115 ohms.
An amplifier with an output impedance of .115 ohms playing a 8 ohm speaker through wire with no resistance (I know there is no such thing) will have a damping factor of 70. Add speaker wire resistance of .115 ohms (a little less than 25 feet of 14 gauge) and the damping factor goes down to 35.
My only point is, speaker wire resistance only causes a small reduction in power to the speaker but decreases the damping factor by much more. So the reason for large speaker wire is not more power but more control.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
thanks for using the sansui as an example, the numbers are fascinating,
I will try to figure out the formulas these results came from.
hapoy listening
It's not sophisticated. The speaker "sees" the output impedance of the amplifier as the actual output impedance plus the resistance of the speaker wires. You just add the two values to get the net total. Then you divide the input impedance of the speaker (keeping in mind that no speaker has a constant input impedance, but we usually use a nominal value) by the net output impedance of the amplifier plus cables. When that ratio goes up, damping factor goes down, as you can easily see.Since DF is mostly an indicator of how well the amplifier can "control" the speaker at low frequencies, you might want to use a speaker impedance value that most represents its impedance at low frequencies. The reason for this concern is that an electromagnetic speaker potentially produces a "back EMF"; when the woofer is moved forward or backward by the amplifier, it will naturally settle back to its original position and even overshoot the resting state. This overshoot causes its magnet and coil to move relative to each other, and this produces a voltage which is called "back EMF". If the DF is low, the amplifier will have a problem dealing with that spurious voltage coming back at it, and that can cause slurring of bass notes. Or so the story goes.
EDIT: So sorry, when the ratio of speaker impedance to net amplifier output impedance goes UP (which happens if speaker impedance along goes up or if amplifier output impedance goes down), DF goes UP (not down). I hope you can see that I was wrong above.
Edits: 02/29/24 02/29/24
thank you again....
Can you hear any difference between damping factors of 70 and 35? I don't think I could. I think DF only begins to make an audible difference when it goes below 10, or somewhere in that range below 10.
I think some speakers are pretty well mechanically damped and don't need much electrical damping. I think speakers with tight voice coil clearances make better use of whatever electrical damping there is.
Others need more electrical damping. I believe cheap "sloppy woofers" with weak magnets and large VC gaps do better with an amplifier with the lowest output impedance.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: