 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.169.213.125
In Reply to: RE: Absolutely Nothing! posted by gusser on June 27, 2023 at 12:57:09
How would you know whether it works or not until you try it or at least see a review. More silly scientific-sounding mumbo jumbo from our resident pseudo scientist. Begone, troll!
Edits: 06/27/23 06/27/23Follow Ups:
" ... How would you know whether it works or not until you try it ..."
The answer to that is simple. The optical device either accurately reads the data or not. It is easy to determine if the data read is correct or not. If the data is correct, than any deviation is an alteration of accuracy.
The alteration then puts you into subjective land. You are then making a subjective argument that your personal preference is better or worse than someone else's personal preference versus that of the accurate interpretation of the original data.
One can prove accuracy without the tweak device. Anything beyond that is an alteration of accuracy.
.
2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED
That's a very large amount of mumbo jumbo. Why not cut to the chase, use a green marker on a CD? Or is that too much trouble for your sensitive intellect?
That sir, is actual computer science. Predictable, repeatable and consistent math and science.If it as malleable as you imply, computers would never work.
I remember the arguments about different lossless formats being better or worse than another or "generational fade" arguments about making a copy of a copy. Generational fade may be an issue for analog pressings but not digital. The only way for digital to fade is if something is broken (or pilot error).
I wrote tests to prove to myself to convert lossless formats from one to another across multiple generations and back again. The only thing that changed was the meta data supported (or not) by each format. The raw PCM data stayed identical with no "generational" or "lossless format" losses or alterations.
This reminds me of a teak device that was tested by ASR. The only improvement the add-on device made was to a poorly engineered DAC with bad noise isolation. For that one instance, it was still cheaper to purchase a properly engineered DAC with noise isolation then the "tweak device" plus a poorly engineered DAC.
I am all for tweaks, that actually work and address real issues.
Since all of my shiny discs are ripped bit-perfect to NVMe and SSDs will the green pen make them even more bit-perfect ???
.
2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED
Edits: 06/27/23 06/27/23
You wrote,"Since all of my shiny discs are ripped bit-perfect to NVMe and SSDs will the green pen make them even more bit-perfect ???"
Well, Mr. Smarty Pants Computer Science, since virtually all CD players - which are what we're talking about on this thread - aren't bit perfect, I'd say you answered your own question. We get a lot of logical fallacies here.
Edits: 06/27/23 06/27/23 06/27/23
Strange, my cheap drives have replicated bit perfect read/writes generation after generation for years.Care to prove your statement ? You seem to keep grasping at straws.
Have you ever used binary diffs on raw PCM data payloads to prove or disprove your statements (I want you to honestly answer this question) ? Part of science is testing your hypothesis and facing the test results and adjusting your hypothesis accordingly.
You maybe conflating very early optical readers on flawed OSes that couldn't simultaneously handle ripping and background tasks from decades ago. Those days are long gone. See my previous comments about being "broken and/or pilot errors".
You are also loosely implying that the green pen implements error correction to non-existent read errors on functional systems which is erroneous at best.
.
2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED
Edits: 06/27/23
Have you ever used the green pen? If not it's you who's grasping at straws and shooting blanks in the dark. I do not have to prove my statements, this is not a peer review forum or any such thing. If you haven't experimented with absorbing scattered laser light you have no case.
You obviously have not tested the raw binary PCM data to confirm/refute your faux claims. The tools are readily available, easy to use and they are FREE. No reason NOT to use them (unless there are vested intere$t$ in play).
Pity that you are so attached to your unfounded beliefs.
I see an M by your moniker so monetary influences maybe the key factor here giving higher priority to placebos over actual scientific analysis tools that debunk the placebos.
When in school, I used to work in the hospital. It was amazing to observe what a periodic syringe full of normal saline injected into an IV line already attached to a bag containing normal saline could do to cure cyclic chronic pain complaints. The complaints would crescendo according to injection intervals and then immediately subside until the next cycle. Truly amazing to observe.
.
2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED
You make a lot of pretty ridiculous assumptions.
Edits: 06/28/23
"... The benefit of such a large reduction in visible and invisible background scattered light is a marked increase in signal to (noise + distortion) ratio. All improvements to the optical reading process are multiplied by a factor of two downstream. There is no substitute for Signal to Noise Ratio. ..."There is so much wrong with this, I don't know where to start.
Bit depth determines SNR. CD's are 16-bit (at best, you can record 2-bit audio on a 16-bit medium).
Your tweak can NOT increase bit-depth unless, it re-records the original performance in a higher bit depth. To do that, you have also mastered time travel in both directions.
Once you are bit perfect, you can't increase SNR (bit depth) with magic films from a fixed bit-depth source.
.
2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED
Edits: 06/28/23
He does that too!Look up the "Clever Little Clock" on his WEB site
Edits: 06/28/23
I have held the distance record for quantum teleportation for a great many years. Even the the Chinese s isn't it's have the official record of 870 miles (they started out with just a few meters) I have the unofficial record of 10,000 miles, set about 15 years ago. It was from Virginia to Australia, a lot more than 10,000 miles if there was a satellite link involved, which there probably was. So it was probably more than 44,000 miles. The Teleportation Tweak. Accept no substitutes.
Edits: 06/29/23 06/29/23 06/29/23 06/29/23 06/29/23
Nt
Nt
I'm taking up your valuable twighlight time and feeding you more shit to chew on while you fashion your next faux audio dream recipe. I'm sure you will think it sounds so much better in your Sony Walkman and won't wait for the next formal review of waste and worthlessness.
He must have a few post-doctorates degrees in creative writing.
I will give him that !!!
.
2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED
Learning new information can often be quite painful, people oft prefer to act like they know everything already.
"An ordinary man has no means of deliverance."
"A sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
he's insulting, derogatory, and annoying. Did I miss anything?
He's a specimen, an old one in his eighties from Virginia
Is his site satire or does he actually sell the stuff ?If people buy it, humanity is doomed more than I thought.
He is actually advertising boxes of rocks.
.
2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED
Edits: 06/28/23
You have yet to present any reproducible findings or diagnostics.
The only time I got read errors was with dirty or physically damaged discs.
Many discs could be restored to zero read errors by simply cleaning and / or polishing them. NOTE: This implies being able to know the difference between read errors and bit-perfect.
In addition to using buffing compounds at home, my local record/CD store has a disc polishing machine that uses varying grits of polish to take out scratches and is able to resurface all but the most damaged discs.
I have one disk that actually has a small pin-hole in the metallic layer straight from the factory. No surface scratches what so ever. That track is impossible to repair.
As for the distortion, it is not something that can be made to sound better. It audibly presents as a glitch or pop in a given track where the damage occurs, not a constant filter, thus further debunks the idea if a green "filter".
See again my previous comments of "broken and/or pilot errors".
.
2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED
Nt
Nt
Maybe your mom while you're trying on her underwear.
no thank you, your comebacks are lousy and are as bad as your magazine reviews. You are truly the King of Losers who will do anything for money. Who's your next online victim you lonesome loser... Reprogram your magic phone and quit playing with yourself.
long live the Queen
Post your data from your testing of scattered laser light. Show us the numbers against the thresholds for accurate data recovery.
Edits: 06/28/23
What about this? what about that? Lol
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
