![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.169.213.125
In Reply to: RE: Futhermore posted by gusser on June 26, 2023 at 14:49:55
Your comments simply reflect your ignorance of both technical issues involved, which I have explained may times as well as how the whole product testing is supposed to work, which I have also gone to great lengths to explain. If you're pretending to be dense you're doing an excellent job.
Edits: 06/26/23Follow Ups:
Correct me where I am wrong, but you only proposed a theory of laser light scatter being a problem. You offered no measurements of this light scatter nor did you do any data integrity tests.The only test you proposed is to try it and see if one hears a difference. If you are who you say you are, you should know full well the potential errors from such an empirical test.
And once again, I answered your last post here without resorting to playground insults. Is this the only way for you to engage in a technical discussion?
Edits: 06/26/23
You're confused. My explanation of the problem of scattered light in CD players is neither a claim or a theory. A person doesn't have to back up ever single statement he makes. This is not some peer review publication. And you are not a peer anyway, although you're pretending to be one. You seem to be under the impression the Green Pen is my product. You're confused again.As for technical arguments you don't have one. All I've seen is a lot of posing from you. Like when you use the term technical discussion.
Edits: 06/27/23 06/27/23 06/27/23 06/27/23
That's all you ever do here. You refuse to engage in any deeper technical discussion. And don't try the old "you would not understand it anyway". If that's the case, that's my problem. The real problem is that you don't know my background at all and therefore I or even some else may call any BS you try to use.
It's a rather common tactic by some of these tweak vendors. "Oh, it's deep quantum theory and you wouldn't begin to understand it so just take my word for it, the product works".
No, it's actually you who refuses to engage in technical discussion here. I have already given the technical explanations for what's going on here with the green pen. And I've explained why testing the Green pen has serious pitfalls. So perhaps it's time for you to hit the library and due some due diligence before huffing and puffing yourself up. Nothing but personal attacks from you this entire thread. S or get off the pot. Unless you can actually give me a technical argument to the points I've made I'm afraid this conversation can serve no purpose any longer. The ball is in your court.
Edits: 06/27/23
Well I'm sorry if you perceive my questions about a technical test routine as attacks.As for your claims, yes, I do see your logic and I don't question the possibility. But I do question if it really happens and then if it has an effect on the audio signal. That has not been tested yet or has it? That was my OP along with a suggested way to do it.
Edits: 06/27/23 06/27/23
I tested the Green Pen and it works, you can put your mind at ease. I explained the shortcomings of the Green Pen already, maybe it was over on the other Green Pen thread. And I developed a superior device - the perfect solution, if I do say so myself - that absorbs all wavelengths of scattered light, not just visible red, which is a relatively small percentage of the CD laser light. Thus the invisible part of the CD laser is absorbed, and that's the majority of the nominal 780 nm laser.Other colors can be used on CDs besides green. Because the colors of the paint on the CD label influence the sound by interfering with the scattered light, further improvements to SQ can be obtained by careful application of other colors. And black should only be used to mark the inner lip of the CD, never on the outer edge.
Edits: 06/27/23 06/27/23 06/27/23 06/27/23
z
Nt
You just claimed you have come up with a device to correct error producing scattered laser light which in your words has never been addressed by the established manufactures.As optical disc technology and the need for accurate data recovery goes far beyond music CD's these days, I would think your invention would be worth tens of millions?
Edits: 06/28/23
Just think, all optical media, DVD, BluRay, CD, picture quality and sound quality, let's say the Green Pen improves SQ 10-25% and DVD picture quality 20-35% then my new product improves SQ improves SQ 50-80% and picture quality 50-80% all things being equal. Gotta be worth more a hundred bucks, right?
Edits: 06/28/23 06/28/23
I also don;t think you want to get into the video claims with me as that's my primary career and experience focus.As the video (and audio for that matter) is compressed on DVD or BlueRay as well as an encryption algorithm is applied, your claims become even more ridiculous.
Edits: 06/28/23
If there was a buck to be made with enhanced video quality, don't you think the studios would have jumped on this a long time ago and added an up charge for said enhancement ???
Imagine getting 1080P picture quality from STDDEF content and bandwidth !!!
Compression tech would be obsolete.
.
2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED
Try to escape the reality tunnel you're trapped.in.
Sorry, never subscribed to the shroom and LSD fads but I am sure many of those in the studios have and would have jumped on the green film to make copious amounts of currency if it worked.
It is not a secret after all or maybe it has been kept from them by the MIB ?
QUICK, set up a meeting with the Sony and Phillips execs before someone else does. Or, you could use time travel to go back in time and negotiate an earlier contract with them. Either way, it is a win/win !!!
.
2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED
Nt
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: