|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.27.41.140
In Reply to: RE: Tre's sketch is also correct posted by Tre' on January 08, 2025 at 20:04:03
With those values, I'm confident this qualifies as a White cathode follower. I don't believe the addition of a 150Ω resistor in series with the upper cathode has a significant impact on the circuit's operation. Easy enough to confirm in SPICE, but I don't think it's necessary.
Follow Ups:
Why on earth that coupling cap is such a low value!
I think if I were tinkering with something like that I'd have tried to use a common cathode resistor or a CCS, just to get as much differential effect out of the output as I could.
but it's not clear to me from the print exactly what impedance it's feeding. There's a 15KΩ, then a stepped attenuator and finally a transformer. :/
If you leave the transformer out (it's only there for a unbalanced output) then you're left with the 15k in series with (2.7k//whatever the input impedance of the amp is). If we call that 2.7k then, with the attenuator turned all the way up, the .47 cap is playing into 17.7k. 2nd edit, Ralph already said this.That gives a -3db point of 19.13Hz. That would still be 1db down at 38.26Hz and there would be phase shift all the way up to 191Hz. Turning the attenuator down would make it better but having a high pass filter, in the audio band, that changes with the volume control setting is bad form.
I mis-spoke. That's not the volume control, it's the trim. So it's not as bad as I thought.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
Edits: 01/09/25 01/09/25
.
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: