|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
172.56.81.223
In Reply to: RE: I'm curious too! posted by Jonesy on February 09, 2023 at 11:10:05
getter. With top and two sides, that extraneous gas should be absorbed. Then some tubes like the Sylvania types with huge getter flashed from top to half way down the tube!
I have a friend, if he is still alive, who worked for RCA and had patents in his name for tubes but of course RCA got the monies but his knowledge was like an encyclopedia. And any "new" circuit for tubes I would bring up from CCS etc., he would say, oh yeah, we did that in 1959, etc. Tubes were like eating an apple, as long as you have teeth. lol
Then Tim Fox, who used to come on here, has vast knowledge as well. I knew him in the Navy where we used mostly all tubes. He was an ET and then went on to become a Master Chief.
iBasso DX300MAX Ti. Focal Utopia and Stellia. iBasso SR2. Mr. Speakers, Ether II, Voce stats. Manley, Absolute headphone amp. LTA MZ3, Z10e electrostatic amp. Many other headphones, amps, cables etc.
Follow Ups:
That's pretty cool that you knew/know those people. A huge yet sad reminder of how some tube refinements were required due to military use and not to make them sound "more open".
Jonesy
"I know just enough to get into trouble. But not enough to get out of it."
Windmill getter is not an indication of a special tube. Some liked Raytheon 5751 windmill getter tubes years ago, but a JJ E83CC is far superior.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: