![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
161.69.65.45
In Reply to: RE: I see some minimal reactance psu elements? posted by Chip647 on November 29, 2023 at 14:13:03
I was referring to an element...that was copy pasted from a typical minimal reactance psu. CCS + VR, As you mention in this case that element was placed after the rest of the psu.
Normally small cap after the rectifier then CCS + VR.
Follow Ups:
I do a full critical inductance LCLC then a CCS into a VR tube.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
I thought the CLC filter was needed before the ccs/vr reg to keep the ripple down.
I could easily move the ccs/vr reg to just after the first (22uF) cap, if this is worth trying.
As for the pp output stage, I don't see the need for a regulated psu.
At least, it would have to be built with higher degree of complexity than this simple ccs/vr regulator.
I thought the CLC filter was needed before the ccs/vr reg to keep the ripple down.
I could easily move the ccs/vr reg to just after the first (22uF) cap, if this is worth trying.
As for the pp output stage, I don't see the need for a regulated psu.
At least, it would have to be built with higher degree of complexity than this simple ccs/vr regulator.
Technically a capacitance multiplier. Still using the VR tubes, the MOSFET works as a source follower and can be any of a number of high voltage MOSFET (IFR720, IFR820, IFRBC20PBF).
The 1 meg resistor buffers the VR tubes from the capacitor, they are only used as a voltage reference for the gate of the MOSFET. It also ramps up the output voltage.
![]()
Thanks Chip
I'll take that under consideration
Br
Thanks Chip
I'll take that under consideration
Br
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: