|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
68.104.110.35
In Reply to: RE: I gave up on all of them. posted by Dave Pogue on January 23, 2020 at 08:30:36
Point taken.
Although would it not be reasonably practical to use some analog or horrors - even digital - EQ in the signal chain to correct for the dolby applied during recording?
There must be something wrong with me for not having something wrong.
Follow Ups:
Both Dolby and DBX work on the principal of dynamic range compression/expansion. Simple EQ can only do a fixed roll-off or accentuate across a frequency band.
ljb
But you may have a point. If there were any REAL interest in this subject, someone would have come up with a Dolby processor that sounds as good -- as musical -- as the best current DACs. My search for musical Dolby playback once took me to a Nakamichi NR-200 -- I mean, NAK made great-sounding gear, right? -- and it was the absolute pits.
I was listening to cassettes just this morning. A friend gave me a bunch. I ended up playing several without Dolby B, and of course they ended up sounding more than a tad bright and wiry, but at least they didn't have that muffled, flat, a-musical sound that characterizes so many commercial cassettes. Cassettes don't have to sound that way -- I have plenty that don't -- and at least part of the reason lies with the Dolby itself and the way it was handled by 1980-era electronics.
Frankly, many of the cassettes I recorded back then -- with no processing at all -- sound a lot better today than any of the Dolbyized ones. Yeah, the tape hiss was more prominent, but so was the music.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: