![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
47.205.21.154
In Reply to: RE: A measurement from ProAc response three posted by Leo loves music on February 26, 2025 at 15:54:57
Here is a measurement of the ProAc response three using a B&K 4006 microphone with DRA Labs MLSSA system measured by John Atkinson so you know its 100% correct.
It's not that bad I have seen worse on speakers costing 5 times more but it's not good either.
Look at the graph 0 dB is your average, and these speakers have a 9 dB spike at 60 HZ. To the human ear an increase of 10 dB sounds twice as loud so a 9 dB spike is unacceptable. A dip of about 2.5 to 3 dB at 2500 KHZ from 7000 KHZ to 10000 KHZ there is a 4 dB spike and from 16000 KHZ to 20000 KHZ there is about a 4 dB spike.
Funny if you look at some Focal or Magico speakers they measure just as bad and cost more. Facts are a lot of very expensive speakers measure poorly. People need to look at things from a manufacturer point of view it is more important to cut corners and make profit than it is to make a speaker with a perfect response.
Follow Ups:
That bass peak appears in same place for many speakers measured in Stereophile, which does not truly exist if measured in anechoic environment. Some of the reasons:
Bass is measured near-field
No anechoic chamber thus vulnerable to room effects
Bass driver measurement is done separately, port output also separately, and then both are spliced onto mid/treble graph without clearly repeatable standards and methods.
Edits: 03/10/25
I like them better than my B&W 801 matrix S2 (at least for now). I also have response two. I like them too.
Thats awesome always nice to switch speakers from time to time.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: