![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.175.54.109
In Reply to: RE: Would you come here to publicly tarnish the sellers reputation? posted by goober58 on July 27, 2011 at 07:50:25
.....throughly.
"What you propose to do seems reasonable given the side of the story as told by the OP. But we don't know what the seller is saying so how can we propose or condone any solution."
All you have to do is go to ebay, and find the seller's name that I provided and check what the seller had to say about it. I called him a fraud, and ebay refunded and no response from the seller.
"And further if a seller or buyer want out of any deal I simply just let them out. Big deal?"
....and that's how businesses are supposed to be run, right?
"I have no interested whatsoever in forcing someone into compliance or damaging their reputations if they communicate with me that they have changed their minds."
First of all, he never communicated with me for over a month, with 3 emails from me. So you haven't even read my op.
Second of all, if someone deliberatley renegeded on deal like this one, they deserved to be have their refutation damaged.
Follow Ups:
He's not here to tell us his side and you got paid.
Now you come here to further damage him? Well good for you!
And even worse you propose AA keeps a list of people we've had bad experiences with - yea right how nice for us to get to ding people we've had problems with without allowing them to tell their story.
.........finding out you 'jumped' the gun with 'blanks'.
You want to talk about people behind their back - I find it offensive.
You propose we form a blacklist - I find it offensive.
That's it that's all - we should just agree to disagree. OK?
........'shot' from the hip with 'blanks'.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: