 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
216.129.176.228
In Reply to: RE: Where is your acknowledgement that Kait erred? posted by Rick W on July 24, 2007 at 14:52:17
...but due to the fact that I genuinely like you, and that despite YOUR own bluster, look at my response to Len_'s WWJD posting.
Providing a link is technically inconvenient for me right at the moment.
Follow Ups:
Write down the post number for god's sake, even with just one browser window it's not complex.
Btw: Tabbed browsers are less resource hoging- Firefox for example allows the use of tabs so you have multiple pages without the large resource increase of running 2 instances of your browser. They'd be on the 'file' menu or equivalent, and can be opened by right clicking as well.
...if you think I would manually write down a URL and then manually type it in again to show you and Rick W where I comment on Geoff's faux pas with Len_'s picture, er.., Intellectual Property.
As for Firefox, or anything else for that matter, I've already told you, I don't have Administrator priveleges where I'm visiting.
Just look at my response to Len_'s WWJD posting. It's not much, but I do think it enough to contradict charges of dodging. Little people accuse Geoff Kait of fraud all the time without substantiation, is that somehow more ethical than Geoff's use of Len_'s picture, er.., Intellectual Property?
It's difficult for me to post a link right now, but follow Len_'s 'WWJD?' thread to see where I state that I don't defend Geoff's action. I think that's the thread anyway. The computer I'm using has low resources and is unable to display two browser windows simultaneously with any reliability.
That's the only other reference to the inability to post a link that I can find, and it says nothing about not having admin priviledges. Asserting that 'I already said that' is nothing if you can't substantiate it. The expectation for you to 'do your homework' with some substantiation, however, is entirely reasonable- The attitude you've taken "I don't feel like putting the effort in" just doesn't cut it if you want to be heard.
...but I really don't understand why you wouldn't just take my word for it. I really don't understand why we're even talking about the issue unless you're just trying to waste our time. I don't understand why you would want to waste our time unless you are a badman like rlw or something?
What do you want from me anyway mister?
;-)
An expectation I extend to all those who call my ethics into question in a public forum. If you're going to make personal accusations, you better have some justification that you can point to, otherwise you're just namecalling.
Just kidding. ;-)
What sort of justification you looking for? I didn't know they pulled the Cable Asylum post I alluded to. Do you think folks calling Geoff Kait a fraud or a charlatan should be required to justify their comments? I demand a public apology from each and every one of them. It better be sincere too. ;-)
I mean, it's a universal instinct. Ya aint gunna make headway against human nature Baddy.
I think a good bout of name calling and a couple pecks of unsubstantiated accusations makes this whole endevor reek of humanity.
:-)
endeavor :)
Please send me the links where you've asked questions that weren't answered or where you requested links.
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
