![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
208.58.2.83
In Reply to: RE: "Geoff's modus operandi." That would mean that he's done this regularly. posted by Len_ on July 23, 2007 at 12:31:48
I've only tried a couple of them. Three, come to think. And they all work wonderfully well. The others... I haven't discussed.
What I do do, is defend him (as I would, and have, anyone) against absurdities hurled by folks who generally haven't auditioned his products. And that's what this discussion is all about, isn't it? You come up with a really petty post with a grandiose claim of "intellectual property" infringement, to wit a pic, when you could simply have asked him to cease use.
But, no. As the discussion has unfurled, it's all about people's outrage over things they simply believe can not be.
clark
Follow Ups:
I've tried two of his products. Maybe I'm only 66.7% as qualified to comment as you are.This discussion isn't about his products. It's about intellectual property infringement (and Geoff's behavior), which is exactly what it is. I did ask him to cease. I have not received a response yet.
Have you not noticed that the vast majority of others commenting have commented on the central issue (IP violation)? It is you and Wellfed that argue about MD products.
On the one hand, under your post as first responses we have badman and dogscanskate and bjh and musetap and AAA discussing personalities and the usual "snake oil" stuff (that makes 5), with Larry I and Audioquest4life weighing in on the notional property issue.
So when you assert, "The vast majority of others commenting have commented on the central issue (IP violation)", your imagined "vast majority" sits on the opposite side of the aisle. And another person (Mike B) wondered why you were cluttering the board.
Well, well, well.
clark
Are you purposing omitting the input from RickW, Powermatic, bjh (his other posts), and Steve Eddy?Well, well, well indeed. This is but one reason why having a rational discussion with you is terribly challenging.
...although I consider those two not even worth the click... and Eddy weighed in a little later, let's be fair... you'd still not have a "vast majority". Heck, you wouldn't even have a majority!
This is but one reason why having a rational discussion with you is terribly challenging, as you would say. Only, you're looking in a mirror.
clark
nt
...by the way he's squeeling and carrying on. And you think Clark is the Bozo in this retarded little vignette?
x
Clark,
Your paranoia and/or ego is showing. I haven't known you for years. I can only recall a couple of past threads I've participated where you were involved.
You and Wellfed are perfectly complimentary creatures. Both of you resort to name calling, motive accusations, and empty one-liners (whose attempt at wit usually misses the mark) without actually talking about anything of merit. Lest you think I'm out on a limb, I'm not the only one that has posted this observation. "No ammo in his tube?" I hardly think you're one to talk.
Are you purposing omitting the input from RickW, Powermatic, bjh, and Steve Eddy?
Well to be fair, Clark's post came just one minute after mine, and he may well not have seen it. Some folks will just hit the Back button which doesn't refresh the page.
Don't let Clark ruffle your feathers. :)
se
![]()
It's always more fun when you're around to nitpick :)
It's always more fun when you're around to nitpick :)
Yeah, well I don't indulge so much these days. Trying to get back my girlish figure.![]()
se
![]()
Well...
Unless you like your feathers ruffled. I dont mind a good hearty hullabaloo no no no.
Remember in the end there is the acid test. If you drown, yer a witch!
Steve
Unless you like your feathers ruffled.
True enough.
I dont mind a good hearty hullabaloo no no no.
I confess, I don't mind a hearty hullabaloo myself from time to time. Try it with a nice dollop of tangy brouhaha sometime. Mmmmm! Good stuff, Maynard!
Remember in the end there is the acid test. If you drown, yer a witch!
Hmmm. It thought it was if you float you're a witch? Or am I thinking of the Monty Python version?
se
![]()
> Remember in the end there is the acid test. If you drown, yer a witch!
> > Hmmm. It thought it was if you float you're a witch? Or am I thinking of the Monty Python version?
If you drown you're a sad excuse for a witch... should'a taken up crochet instead.
No Guru, No Method, No Teacher
Wow you are a nitpicker dammit. Yes yes it's the other way around but it's nice to think the witch drowns in the end. It's the American Way for the good guy to win...at least since John Wayne and Clint Eastwood.
Wow you are a nitpicker dammit.
Well of course. Jeff wouldn't go around just makin' shit up about me. He's a friend.
Yes yes it's the other way around but it's nice to think the witch drowns in the end. It's the American Way for the good guy to win...at least since John Wayne and Clint Eastwood.
Not to mention... Randolph Scott ( chorus Randolf Scott!).
se
![]()
d
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: