 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
104.60.35.252
In Reply to: RE: Anyone using Jplay? Review said it was better sounding than Roon posted by soundchekk on June 29, 2024 at 08:36:40
That is nice of you making the Eversolo guy spend more money :)
The usb thing is because I use DANTE and have 2 devices that output AES, 2 Devices that have a balanced DAC, and one device that outputs AES, coax, and toslink. I have 2 computers and since all devices and computers are on the network I can send audio wherever I want. So if I want to watch movies I can send that sound to the bed for instance or send music from the music computer to my main system, etc. Lots of flexibility.
With Daphile I had to use USB and can only send the signal to one device. Though I could send the signal to a Big Ben and switch between the different computers but not send different signals to different devices. So the usb was less flexible and the usb to spdif device was just $60 so not sure how good it was.
But I could live with those limitations if the sound was there. Daphile sounded great I used it for a few months. I then switched back to Hysolid on the same machine and there wasn't a big difference. Hysolid sounded better in some regards and not in others. It was hard to A/B obviously. So I ditched Daphile. Also the control of Daphile was lame. Like who uses QUES? I just want to play an album or track by clicking on it. Maybe there was a way around that but I never found it.
I was excited about the upsampling in Daphile and through USB could get 192k. My DANTE is limited to 96k. At the end I concluded that upsampling via Daphile didn't really do much in terms of sound and limited me to 1 or 2 dacs.
Anyhow I was reading that Jplay was a better sounding option and thought I could use it with Hysolid. Its possible but recently I don't find myself going out of my way to fiddle. But would if it seems like a good upgrade.
What would a RPi5 get me over what I have given my daphile experience?
Cut to razor sounding violins
Follow Ups:
You can try it, but I suspect you'll find much at all as "improvement" My friend brought his RPi setup over and we conducted a non-scientific comparison.
Bias? Of course. He wanted to like his RPi setup versus my Daphile, and I wanted to prefer my Daphile. At the end of the day both setups sounded great and we were hard-pressed to note significant differences.
Also, for what its worth, I didn't get much out of "upsampling" either. While in some cases upsampling in Daphile sounded different than the non upsampled audio track, I can't say that it was "better".
Daphile doesn't limit you to one or two DAC's. With the right plugins, you have much flexibility to select multiple DAC's or endpoints. In my use case, Dahile can output to my choice of two DAC's, a Wiim Mini, or either of two Google Nest Minis we have here at the house. You can also synchronize output so that Daphile can output to the above devices at the same time.
You can't compare apples and oranges.
"RPi vs Daphile"
You can compare
pCP vs Daphile
and/or
RPi vs X86
The RPi(5) is simply much less complex than a PC. A simple 5V supply
is required. A SBC - done right - IMO beats any PC. If you run custom
SW like your RME or other ProAudio stuff it's a different story of course.
But. Do I need that for audio playback !?!?
Many (most!?!?) streamers run a small Linux based SBCs inside btw.
Now.
pCP vs Daphile. pCP is the OS utilising the least amount of resources and it focusses on Lyrion/squeezelite only.
Most other OSes, such as Moode, Daphile, Volumio IMO do not come close to the efficiency of PCP. I've been working for Moode for a while. In the end they want to attract all kind of users (customers) and therefore these kind of systems get bloated over time. pCP is still a pretty lean approach. However.
The pCP folks are all but audiophile minded. That the system performs the way
it does is related to the very efficient way of using resources - and that's the contribution of its base OS - Tiny Core Linux. In the past I also contributed this or that optimization to pCP - as long as a tweak didn't get the label "audiophile", they (Paul) was willing to accept it. I even offer(ed) a small set of tools to make pCP sing. It's still on github. (I havn't ported it to RPi5 yet - perhaps after summer)
Anyhow. I do think with your rather complex DANTE and AES setup it's gonna be tricky to port such an approach. Perhaps you could/should rethink the whole setup.
Just playing around with a RPi5 is no big deal on the other hand.
You can btw also sync clients on Lyrion. You can also use shairport-sync (an Apple Airplay port) on RPI if you want to get video sound on your audio system - I do that via Apple TV > > RPI (Note: my TV runs as sole HDMI-display - no network - no nothing, all SW is handled via Apple TV).
If you really need to SRC - it can also be done by Lyrion or squeezelite
Today, with numerous real great budget audio interface offerings at hand, it's IMO worth to review any setup/chain out there. That's why my main audio system is a standalone system nowadays. For most other settings I use Bluetooth or Airplay straight from the iPhone. I really don't want numerous audio RPis and or PCs in the house. Makes life much easier. ;)
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
