OTL Asylum

I don't have any problems with the ECC99

71.34.57.94

Ralph

In Reply to: RE: Well heck... posted by Lew on February 13, 2008 at 12:12:05

if it were in production I'd be likely to use it. It would be more effective with the zener circuit I mentioned.

We tried something in the neighborhood of 20 different CCS configurations. Most of them represented some form of compromise- the one we settled on gave the lowest noise (it is noisier if you *bypass* the zeners, BTW) while at the same time the best differential effect- the best of both worlds. Plus it has a low parts count :)

Follow Ups:

They're out of production? - Lew 17:16:39 02/13/08 (2)
Holy cow, I'd better hunt down a few more. All my CCSs are done with ECC99. I've got about a dozen spares.
- RE: No- (sorry about that) It looks like JJ started making them recently - Ralph 08:46:45 02/14/08 (1)
  So that opens up some possibilities!
  - RE: No- (sorry about that) It looks like JJ started making them recently - jb0194 09:11:47 02/14/08 (0)
    Ralph,
    
    Would a change to ECC99 apply to MA-1 amps?
    
    Do let us know if you decide to offer such a CCS change.
    
    I have a bunch of unused Soviet military version of these tubes now going to waste...
    
    jb

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable