Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
174.243.240.105
In Reply to: RE: A disclaimer posted by E-Stat on January 10, 2025 at 13:41:24
Pass makes a good point relating to Fig10 in that article that you'd have to apply 40dB of feedback to get back to where you where at 0dB (with 1% second harmonic and 0.3% third harmonic). The irony is that with 75dB of feedback you'd be much, much better off than having none! If you can actually apply 75dB of feedback that is! I look at this in two ways: designing for lowest distortion without overall negative feedback is an interesting design challenge and a noble cause but easy, designing with really high loop gains is difficult and, IMHO, beyond the capabilities of many. But, perhaps, 1% 2HD & 0.3% 3HD is perfectly acceptable so it is moot. Except that audiophiles seem to be threatened by stuff that measures well because they chose something that measures less well, even though they like what they have. And audio designers seem threatened because they don't want the market to become commoditized, which can happen if someone takes the time to master feedback and uses it to produce lower priced amplifiers.
Follow Ups:
I'm not a fan of multitudes of high order harmonics that accumulate at the top. :)
![]()
Edits: 01/10/25
Looks like Nelson has transcended guru-ship and is going for Wizard status.
who find having to put a massive filter on the output of an amp to remove copious amounts of ultrasonic garbage is not the best way to go.Do those who listen to Hypex amps do the same as John Atkinson must in order for the noise not to overload his gear?
Dan D'Agostino never liked the "fuzz" always seen on square waves.
Edits: 01/11/25
Nt
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: