Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

Planar Speaker Asylum

RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes?

216.158.98.226

In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by AkuAnkka on November 17, 2024 at 11:12:51

Yes, I know but it is a bit risky to run the ribbon without a capacitor in series. I also have the possibility to run up to 4-way but do not.

Follow Ups:

RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 23:27:17 11/17/24 (22)
Well, that problem could be solved by adding a capacitor in series with ribbon, wouldn't it..? :-) This is exactly what I'm now trying to understand; is it really "too risky" to connect ribbon (and/or mid driver) directly to the tube amp, or would it be a good idea to use some good quality capacitor as a protection?

Blowing a ribbon, compared to a "normal" dynamic tweeter, shouldn't be a catastrophic situation anyway, because it's quite easy to fix with manufacturer's repair kit. But of course, if it is clear that it WILL blow up sooner or later, it might be wiser to prevent it from the beginning.
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - josh358 12:54:33 12/02/24 (17)
  I wouldn't run the ribbon without a capacitor. It isn't just a matter of DC. It's all too easy to make a mistake, and then your ribbons are fried. As Roger says, you can compensate for the cap electronically if you wish. But I agree with him that since you want a cap, you might as well leave the existing crossover in place. It's easier, cheaper, and more practical.
  
  I do run my system three-way, but that's because I've replaced the mids with Neo 8s, which are much more efficient than the ribbon and bass panels. I had them padded down for a while, but it was fairly ridiculous.
  
  By the way, I second Roger's concern about the adhesive on the mids. Mine kept coming loose, and I had to press them back down. Don't know how he solved that problem. I agree too with his suggestion to replace them with foil if you can.
  
  Finally, I don't think tubes are the best way to drive Maggies. They're just too power hungry. Maggies require several hundred watts to "sing." (Of course, it depends on how loud you like to listen -- I like to turn them up occasionally and listen at realistic levels, but most of us don't do that most of the time.) I had a Parasound A-21 on my bass panels for quite a while, and now I have a capable Class D amp and the Parasound is driving the tweeters -- overkill, I know, but I already have the Parasound, along with an AHB-2 on the mids -- not a large amp, but it's fine for the highly efficient Neo line.
  - RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 01:23:09 12/03/24 (16)
    Thanks Josh!
    
    I know that Maggies ARE power hungry. But I have always thought that it's mainly the bass drivers which needs the power, not so much mids or highs, but does anyone have any facts/experiences on this?
    - RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - josh358 13:11:50 12/03/24 (0)
      The whole speaker is inefficient. The IVA manual claims that 200 watts will driven them to 110 dB SPL at the listener's seat.
      
      Bass, as you suggest, typically requires the most power, followed by midrange (though it isn't that much lower), with the tweeter needing much less. I'd probably split the difference and go with equal power for the bass and mid/tweet combo.
      
      My personal preference is for lots of headroom, IMO, a solid-state amp should never clip -- the limit should be set by the speakers and their fuses and your ears.
    - RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 02:51:07 12/03/24 (14)
      Yes, the mids/tweeters do need a fair bit of power and the impedance is rather low. I have seen them driven by Krells on the basses and Audio Research on the rest, not sure what model, maybe D-90. If the tweeters are padded down (with a series resistor) their impedance will not be a problem for most tube amps. Padding down will be a must if you go for foil on the mids (it lowers the output on them).
      
      My mids are still not fixed... I will need a replacement of the Mylar as well.
      - RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - josh358 13:14:51 12/03/24 (6)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by Roger Gustavsson on December 03, 2024 at 02:51:07
        
        Why not go with the Neo 8 clones? They slot right in to the existing baffle.
        
        RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 00:08:48 12/04/24 (5)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by josh358 on December 03, 2024 at 13:14:51
        
        Which clones exactly do you mean? I thought that NEO8's or any similar drivers are not available anymore...?
        
        RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - josh358 11:06:00 12/04/24 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by AkuAnkka on December 04, 2024 at 00:08:48
        
        The clones are apparently pretty good, they've been compared side-by-side. Emailtim here has some.
        
        In one way they're better -- their impedance is 8 ohms so you can make the line come out to 4 ohms. Not that it's super important given how efficient they are.
        
        The Tympani IVA can accommodate only 7 of them in the original baffle, but they are the same width as the opening so really easy to mount.
        
        I like the original IVA midrange, but these are head and shoulders better, at least the original mids are.
        
        RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 04:15:52 12/04/24 (3)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by AkuAnkka on December 04, 2024 at 00:08:48
        
        Maybe these https://www.parts-express.com/GRS-PT6825-8-8-Planar-Mid-Tweeter-8-Ohm-272-126?quantity=1
        The GRS seems to have a bump at the fundamental resonance, the BG had no such bump.
        As you will need 14-16 of these, it will not be a cheap option for us in Europe.
        The original BG Neo 8 were better but became worse in its last years of production. The European distributor droped them because of large variations between samples.
        
        Edits: 12/04/24
        
        RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 04:59:38 12/04/24 (2)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by Roger Gustavsson on December 04, 2024 at 04:15:52
        
        Thanks Roger! 16 pcs of those would not be "cheap", but I'm afraid that if I have to send my mids from Europe to USA (and back) for refurbishing process, it might cost even bit more...?
        
        Small bumps wouldn't be a problem anyway due DEQX, if the sound quality over all would be better than stock. But does anyone here have any experience on those GRS's, how would line of those compare to the TIVa's original mids (or NEO8's)?
        
        RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 06:42:44 12/04/24 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by AkuAnkka on December 04, 2024 at 04:59:38
        
        A line of the original BG Neo 8 have some users, Josh is one of them. Refurbishing Magnepan can be done in Europe (some guys in Germany). Sending them to Magnepan will be very expensive...
        
        Edits: 12/05/24
        
        RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - goryu 05:14:00 12/04/24 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by AkuAnkka on December 04, 2024 at 04:59:38
        
        Check your messages please....
      - RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 03:16:30 12/03/24 (6)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by Roger Gustavsson on December 03, 2024 at 02:51:07
        
        Actually, now I found one nice tube amp DIY kit, which gives around 28 watts of output AND can be easily modified for 2 ohm outputs also, so low impedance shouldn't be a problem at all! :-)
        
        Also, drivers' different sensitivities/volumes is not a problem either, since I can easily match them on the DEQX.
        
        But Roger, when you say that "mids/tweeters do need a fair bit of power", what exactly do you mean, how much is "fair" for highs, how much for mids? Have you tried some lower power (tube) amps on them, what happened, how was the sound? I don't need "realistic" volumes anyway, I usually like to listen at quite mediocre volume levels.
        
        And I understand well that it might be hard to say any exact wattages, "enough power" depends on so many variables. But if someone here has already tried any low power amps on 3-way setup, I'd really would appreciate to hear some real life experiences, both good and bad.
        
        RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 03:55:58 12/03/24 (5)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by AkuAnkka on December 03, 2024 at 03:16:30
        
        I have used a Denon minireceiver for my 3.6 for a while. Output was like 2x45 W in 4 Ohm. Later, I went to something like 2x130 W and then
        4x260 W. The peak power for higher frequencies is almost as high as for the bass. Most Magnepans are not as efficient as the numbers on the Magnepan's spec. I have measured something like 82-83 dB/2.83 V.
        
        RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 04:17:36 12/03/24 (4)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by Roger Gustavsson on December 03, 2024 at 03:55:58
        
        Roger, are you sure about this: "The peak power for higher frequencies is almost as high as for the bass"??
        
        For example, at PS Audio's web page it is said that "It takes a ton of energy to reproduce bass notes, but not a great deal as the scale goes upwards. Fact is, most tweeters never see more than a few watts."
        
        https://www.psaudio.com/blogs/pauls-posts/tweeter-power?srsltid=AfmBOoolGcWuHJHrs-ksa08d11QtZEmouUrLOXbaKXvLxV0gsN5o31C1
        
        RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 08:07:00 12/03/24 (3)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by AkuAnkka on December 03, 2024 at 04:17:36
        
        Here are two examples:
        Michael Jackson - Don't stop til you get enough, the upper curve
        
        Michael Ruff - Wishing Well, orange below 100 Hz, blue above 100 Hz
        
        Edits: 12/03/24
        
        RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 09:52:09 12/03/24 (2)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by Roger Gustavsson on December 03, 2024 at 08:07:00
        
        Thanks again Roger, but I don't have a clue what these images should tell me regarding the tweeter's power needs? :-)
        
        RE: Roger's comment ... - andyr 13:25:30 12/05/24 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by AkuAnkka on December 03, 2024 at 09:52:09
        
        " My advice is still to have similar power on basses and mid/tweeter " ... I would agree.
        
        I used (ss amps):
        * 180w into 4 ohms on the bass panels
        * and 120w into 4 ohms on the mids & ribbons (3ohm ribbons).
        
        RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 10:06:17 12/03/24 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? posted by AkuAnkka on December 03, 2024 at 09:52:09
        
        The one on top, shows the same level from bass to tweeter.
        
        The second one, shows a higher power demand for frequencies above 100 than below, 3 times more.
        
        These are peak level not average. Musik is peak level, not sinus.
        
        My advice is still to have similar power on basses and mid/tweeter.
- Rebuilding a Magnepan true ribbon tweeter is NOT an easy job. - MWE 18:20:23 11/18/24 (0)
  Very delicate and tedious work. Of course, entire replacement units can be had, at a cost.
  
  Mark in NC
  "The thought that life could be better is woven indelibly into our hearts and our brains" -Paul Simon
- RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - Roger Gustavsson 00:54:52 11/18/24 (2)
  Adding a capcitor in series with th ribbon is almost a crossover. Why make things more complicated with adding another power amp? The cost of a dual channel power amp is higher than using a passive crossover.
  - RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - AkuAnkka 01:32:56 11/18/24 (1)
    Good point about the extra cost of another power amp. My main point for tri-amping was the DEQX, which easily allows trying & listening different crossover points & slopes (for example even 96db) for the best sound. DEQX will also allow frequency- & phase corrections for all drivers, and for the best outcome, every driver should be measured separately on the near field.
    
    Minimizing the number of passive components from the signal path is of course a plus also.
    - RE: Tri-amping T IV-A's with tubes? - emailtim 22:01:09 11/18/24 (0)
      FWIW, I quad amp and use both fuses and a cap to protect the ribbons.
      
      I do NOT use tube amps so I can't speak to their unique properties/considerations.
      When you design your ribbon XO, you will have to take into account both the slope and phase rotation caused by the cap you select in addition to your DEQX XO, should you chose to use one.
      I designed a FIR ribbon XO that includes a filter which electronically erases the slope and phase rotation of the cap, so when playing, the cap is essentially out of the circuit leaving just the digital XO. This guarantees the Mid and Ribbon XO's ideally sum without the cap's signature tainting the XO region.
      .
      
      2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED
      
      Edits: 11/18/24

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

The Cable Cooker