Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
185.161.203.156
In Reply to: RE: stacking maggies posted by josh358 on September 30, 2024 at 09:48:05
MG 3.5 was not quasi ribbon, 3.7 was the firat 3-series with flat wire/foil/quasi ribbon.
There are some guys that have repaired the push-pull drivers without destroying the Mylar.
Follow Ups:
I was referring to the midrange -- according to the MUG model list the 3.5R has a quasi ribbon midrange. It makes more of a difference to the midrange than to the bass.
The MG 3.5 has normal round wires just as the 3.6! MUG model list is full of faults. The early Tympani models, before the I-D had a few changes without a new model name. I have seen three different Tympani III-A. I think these were produced for a period of about two years.
I have a pair of rebuilt MGIIIA and can buy a second set quite easily. The alternative appears to be an older 20.1 and take a gamble on any potential rebuild but for similar money I could buy something that is post 2005 like two pairs of 0.7s however this means QR tweeter and I see a big attraction in a long true ribbon.
> how significant is the benefit of the lighter QR versus older round wire for the drive panels?
I anticipate a damped metal frame for the vertical stack and mechanically decouplng the ribbon tweeter from the other panels. I am also assuming that a metal frame that minimizes the width of the speaker coupled with a `wing' to compensate for the reduction in baffle width, may help accentuate the approximation towards a `line source'
The important thing is to keep the acoustical centers as close together as possible.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: