|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
73.229.163.4
In Reply to: RE: Memory transport -nt posted by E-Stat on October 16, 2024 at 05:41:38
The NAS isn't actually PLAYING music but you say that loading 6GB of music into its RAM is beneficial. I'm just trying to understand how that would be beneficial when the music data is sent over the network from the NAS to a network streamer that does the playing ?
Edits: 10/16/24Follow Ups:
and I'm out of here. Have a good day!
Figured you couldn't explain it. Nothing in your linked post answers the question on why buffering 6GB of music on the NAS is beneficial for PLAYBACK over the network on a network streamer.
First of all the NAS is not a "memory PLAYER". It is not a PLAYER at all. The streamer is doing the PLAYING.
And if you go back to "drain and fill" math from elementary school, the NAS will not "drain" any faster than what can be "filled" and PLAYED on the streamer. Hence, no advantage to buffering 6GB of music on the NAS for PLAYBACK on the streamer.
But thanks anyway.
The RPi can *drain* an entire CD.
What is your problem?
No problem. Just chuckling at your inability (or refusal) to understand basic tech."The RPi can *drain* an entire CD."
So, that still doesn't explain any benefit to buffering 6GB of music in RAM on the NAS.
I'm outta here now.
Edits: 10/16/24
Yeah, correcting yet another case where you just make up $hit about my systems.
Edits: 10/16/24
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: