DVD-Audiobahn

completely disagree

24.179.58.245

Joe Murphy Jr

A

In Reply to: RE: I'm a little disappointed to be honest posted by Say on May 17, 2011 at 12:04:05

Further compressing the CD medium is a bad thing. If that's your cup of tea, so be it. But nonetheless, it's a bad cup of tea that you so enjoy.

RUSH is not some boy band nor are they some new pop sensation. They're three very talented musicians, especially in the areas of musicianship and complexity. They have assended to a music echelon in which very few groups have risen, one in which the whole truly is greater than the sum of its parts. As fans, musicians and audiophiles who recognise this and support their continued contribution to recorded and live music, we deserved and do deserve better. Period.

Follow Ups:

RE: completely disagree - Say 06:53:44 05/19/11 (3)
hogwash!
Not just Rush but all bands would greatly enhance our musical pleasure if they meticulously mastered their pressings.
As for Mr. Joe Murphy Jr's generalized statement that 'further compressing the cd medium is a bad thing" is not just a personal statement but one bereft of any conclusive information and that taking his advice is fraught with disclaiming many good sounding cds. Try this Joe, play the mofi gold version of Moving Pictures. Do the same with a later remaster and do the same with the current 30th anniversary double disc's cd version. Which one sounds better to YOUR ears? Your answer will say a lot about your judgement, which at the moment is premature.
And you are wasting your time with the 'boy band' lecture. Sounds like you are more full of yourself than sure of yourself. I await your listening results with open arms.
Like I earlier mentioned compared to many other band's discs this new one from Rush is not all that compressed. What compression is there greatly enhances information available on the disc and not at the cost of piercing sound.
Until you try that little experiment above keep your generalizations to yourself.

Edits: 05/19/11 05/19/11 05/19/11 05/19/11
- for your information - Joe Murphy Jr 09:14:53 05/19/11 (1)
  I own many versions of Moving Pictures: the initial CD release, the CD Remaster, the MFSL CD, the just released Deluxe Edition Blu-ray/CD and the initial album release, so I can do what you ask and more.
  
  And as one who owns numerous versions of Moving Pictures, in my opinion, with regard to audio quality, the MFSL Gold CD of Moving Pictures is the release to own. Period.
  
  Just because what they did "compared to many other band's discs this new one from Rush is not all that compressed" doesn't make it right. You must be a groupie, because no self-respecting fan, musician or audiophile would say such assinine crap. Next time you go to a live concert, make sure you tell the engineer on the board to boost the bass, jack up the highs and kick in some compression so the band sounds like the sub-par CD they released. I hope they tear up the ticket in your face after they boot your sorry ass out the door.
  
  Have a nice day.
  - RE: for your information - Say 09:33:42 05/19/11 (0)
    so you did the test? Good. Unfortunately someone is being dishonest here. I am confident in my judgement for I don't need someone to tell me how something sounds. I do that for myself. I don't need a panel of slides to move, buttons to push or sound waves to measure. Why? Because I just heard the best Moving Pictures on cd and it is the 30th Ann. Edition. Period!
    So what does our discrepancy make of our results Joe? You being the senior member at AA and me a newb. I'l tell you what to make out of it.
    A) you really did not listen to the 30th anniversary edition
    B) you did and you are obstinate for a reason
    C) you are deluding yourself
    D) you have poor listening skills.
    Now if you think this version of the cd is fraught with boosted bass, jacked up highs and compression you may or may not be right. All is relative. BTW, I have fun at concerts Joe. I've been to tons. Going into my fifth decade I don't need some anonymous Joe to tell me about music. Nor do I appreciate your attempt at insults. If you can't carry on a mature and decent conversation without Ad hominem attacks than keep your disrespectful behavior to yourself and away from this topic.
    We are talking about one record and one record only. Stop deviating and generalizing. In fact those who do are seldom sure of themselves instead they are full of it. If you have to then let's do it apples to apples - I believe that the MFSL gold cd of 'Permanent Waves' is the best sounding cd available. I will also state that the best sounding 'Signals' is also the one from MFSL.
    This guy here also agrees with me about Moving Pictures. Not that it means anything because I am not him:
    http://musictap.net/2011/04/18/review-moving-pictures-2011-remaster-cddvd-30th-anniversary-deluxe-edition-rush/
    
    Edits: 05/19/11 05/19/11 05/19/11 05/19/11 05/19/11 05/19/11
- RE: completely disagree - Say 07:54:37 05/19/11 (0)
  regarding overly compressed cds try Wall of Voodoo's - Index Masters(2005) or Van Halen's - Best of Both Worlds (2004). Good tunes but horrendously loud. In those there is no dynamic range since the soft passages are just as loud as the boisterous ones. In comparison the latest Moving Pictures is sane.
  and this is what I'm trying to say. For me there is a limit where compression is bad and where it is not. Most every rock recording is compressed anyway. Even LP's. The difference is in the amount.
  
  Edits: 05/19/11

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Schiit Audio