![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.169.214.23
In Reply to: RE: MQA Comparisons posted by Doug Schneider on November 18, 2022 at 09:48:22
The only "proper listening tests" you found were the ones that confirm to your views. Negative results from any test shoukd be viewed with a jaundiced eye, as so many things can and do go wrong. One wonders why tests would include "unskilled listeners" whatever that means and what the skill level was of the "skilled listeners."
The best laid plans of mice and men oft go awry.
Follow Ups:
Oh geez, you. Which products do you sell again? And what are those claims for them that you make? Please, remind us.
Doug
It's a logical fallacy to think attacking my products which, by the way, I'm sure you known nothing about, can help prove your case. As hominem attacks are invalid arguments. It's also a logical fallacy (Appeal to Authority/Credentials) to claim that McGill university conducted a foolproof test - even if they employed controlled blind testing.At what point does one go from unskilled listener to skilled listener? after three beers?
Edits: 11/19/22 11/19/22
I know I'm appealing to nonsense -- but do you actually ever read anything you criticize?
I know, I know -- that would be asking too much.
Have a good day, and keep making those claims.
Doug
Everything's topsy turvy, me topsy you turvy.
Ha! You give yourself too much credit.
When someone positions him- or herself as the Town Clown, it puts a smile on my face. It's kind of like watching people perform on The Gong Show.
Doug
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: