![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
69.118.107.235
In Reply to: RE: Nor did we need them to know the difference between passive and active nt posted by Ralph on November 08, 2024 at 09:15:36
Usually a preamp with no gain is considered as passive. But this one is special. It has active circuits inside.In 1991, Motorola rocked.
Edits: 11/08/24Follow Ups:
A passive component is, simply, one that does not require an external power source in order to function. A transformer is a passive device even though it can provide a voltage gain (albeit cost of current).
w/o any circuit, you call it active or passive.Please do not fussy about words. It is meaningless.
Edits: 11/08/24
Let's take the example of what happens if the power supply is disconnected.
If a motorized pot it will still play. An actual active circuit such as the one that is the subject of this thread will not.
Kapish?
Words have a lot of meaning. You can build everything on words including bankrupt.
The whole point of this thread is BUF03 not the passive.
There are many companies went to bankrupt because they voted the wrong CEO.
Our preamp has a passive volume control, but has active circuitry after it.
So its considered 'active'.
Just because a regular volume control (which in itself is passive) does not mean the circuit is considered passive if active devices are involved! Kal is correct.
.
BUF03 perhaps is the only opamp in class A mode on this earth.
![]()
-
Do you remember the model number of the class A opamps you mentioned? I am very interested. Thanks a lot!
-just one, common, example.
It is good to know that NE5534 is a class A opamp. Wow!!!Which planet are you on?
Edits: 11/11/24
see link.
Good point so you can use any cheap opamp in your products.
Things like gain bandwidth product affect it more. Nice to have low noise too.
Very true. When all the people on this planet get used to the sound of class D. They do not miss class A a single bit.
========================================
There are two kind of liars. Blink eyes/ do not blink eyes
I didn't miss Class A way before I started auditioning Class D amps. The Class A amps I had seemed rather smooth, polite, and dynamically challenged. I owned better sounding Class AB amps. To be perfectly honest I don't think it's a "Class" thing. There are good and bad sounding amps in all Classes.
I've had several different Class D amps in and out of my system over the past 25 years. Class D has improved incrementally over time and I find that there are a number of outstanding current generation Class D amps. I've been running a couple with excellent results for the past 5 years.
![]()
Wow, an old friend.
AI Overview
Learn more
...-
The NE5534 is a low-noise, single operational amplifier (op amp) that is not specific to a particular class of amplifier. However, class AB amplifiers are a combination of class A and class B amplifiers that can be more efficient than class A while having less distortion than class B.
From what I've seen most opamps operating in Class A or one leg of the output biased Class A (single ended), can't dissipate much power. I suppose one can add a transistor buffer at the output - a FET or even an old school bipolar darlington configuration.
Edits: 11/09/24
and output impedance down to 2ohms. Is that enough?
![]()
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: