![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Hammond 193L choke tweak - impressions (contradictory). posted by cdc on May 1, 2007 at 01:23:34:
OK...I will shed a little light...but only because asked...the choke can be wired many different pending your overall design application. A typical install is to just use the choke as a local and wire it across the hot and neutral of a single duplex outlet. I use this method and I strongly feel it offers the best overall effect. Another method, clustering, wires a single choke across two duplex outlets with the understanding other chokes will be plugged into the same duplex outlets. In this type of set up you have 3 components. 1. Power Cord. 2. Choke. 3. Duplex Outlets x 2. In the clustered method the effect of the split choke is less at the duplex than the method I prefer. The only component that does not see a difference in strength is the connecting power cord. So when you plug the power cord of choke 2 into the split duplex of choke 1, you now achieved the same effect as you would if you used my preferred method. I usually recommend using a 193L for a single duplex and a 193M for a split output. Recently, I have experimented with using the larger 193M on the primary of a isolation ransformer to balance the inductance level on both sides of the transformer. The secondary has 5 193L's installed....so I am currently using a pair of 193M's wired into the main power cord. So far I am extremely pleased with the results. I also use other items as pasrt of the power cord design. All items are based on increasing the conductive flow of the power cord.Alan
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Hammond 193L choke tweak - impressions (contradictory). - audionutge@yahoo.com 06:16:43 05/01/07 (0)