![]() |
Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
In Reply to: New Kt77's posted by Kevin on January 20, 2006 at 04:49:58:
This will be my last cross-polination of usenet/www for the day ;-)
KT77 is supposed to be a beam tube. I don't know abouit the new one though.
Ned Carlson
Dec 13 2005, 10:34 am show optionsNewsgroups: alt.guitar.amps
From: Ned Carlson- Find messages by this author
Date: 13 Dec 2005 12:34:01 -0600
Local: Tues, Dec 13 2005 10:34 am
Subject: Re: KT77 - did I miss the discussion?
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report AbuseOn Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:37:14 -0600, PMG wrote:
> Eurotubes is saying: "It's capable of a max dissipation of 32
> watts..." What's an EL34? Because they say you can use that "It can
> be used in most any amp that uses EL34's for a different flavor." Is
> an EL34 around 25watts max?
The original specs for KT77 can be found here:
http://www.tubezone.net/pdf/kt77mov.pdfWhile GEC quotes 32W, they don't necessarily *recommend*
that KT77's be used that way. In fact they state the life
of the tube is going to considerably shorter if you operate them
that way.
Basically, a KT77 is a beam tetrode that's interchangeable
with EL34, like the large bulb 6CA7.> Is JJ/Tesla *really* building KT-77 tubes for guitar amps, or are
> these more for the HiFi freaks?I don't know of many tubes that were *specifically* designed for
use in guitar amps (the GE 6550A is one I can think of, the old
Sovtek 12AX7WXT another). Guitar amplifiers are just a variety
of AC audio frequency amplifier, albeit a mobile one, so the tubes
have to handle being bumped around when the amplifier is moved.Different strokes for different folks, some folks are going to like
KT77's for the kind of music they want to play, others aren't.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: New Kt77's - P-90 09:02:37 01/26/06 (0)