|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly posted by Ted Smith on December 23, 2006 at 12:22:43:
"I have most SACDs and they do have some variability, but not nearly as much as CDs."I'd think higher resolution playback would increase the perceived variability amongst recordings.... Or in other words, the variables in recording at the studio would be more-noticeable off the high-rez format, hence perceived as more variable.
And conversely, there should be less perceived variance amongst MP3 recordings. For the differences at the studio are obscured even further by yet lower resolution media storage and playback.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Todd Krieger 03:28:26 12/26/06 (2)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 12:58:56 12/26/06 (1)
- Sony shpuld have scrapped many of the rock titles. - Ozzie 09:24:16 12/27/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
