In Reply to: quad CDP MkII (not CDP 2) posted by razzmatazz on August 20, 2006 at 06:40:34:
*but! i have to add this - considering that my current crap pioneer DVD player costs 24 times less the quad CDP, i can't say it did a job 24 times better.*
With high-end audio, the math never works out right and I'd say that higher you go up in digial, the return on investment gets smaller and smaller.*ICs were again the cheapest 1$ no name cables you get with your 9.99$ plastic DVD player. even pre-active link is poor old kimber PBJ. no single audiophile thing.*
Whilst I am not going to endorse free cables that comes with a mass-marketed dvd player, it's wrong to assume higher priced cables perform better than less costlier ones.*i will really start to believe in their marketing mantras - don't waste money on digital front end, buy 200 pounds denon player because you will need to spend XXXX$£ to improve things for a few percent.*
It's not the dollar you spent that counts. It's finding a kit that works together *for you*.
The source first dogma sometimes do not work, yet I do still believe that the right source will dictate the tone and presentation of a given system.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: quad CDP MkII (not CDP 2) - kuma 19:24:50 08/20/06 (2)
- thule cd 100 - razz........ 01:24:22 08/21/06 (0)
- Re: thule cd 100 - kuma 20:21:37 08/21/06 (1)