In Reply to: RE: Nothing wrong with optical posted by Dawnrazor on November 3, 2023 at 17:05:51:
Lifatec, that's one i never knew of, i use a uk shop site called futureshop, it might be on there as optics or other things, and i missed it hmm. I've heard of lifatec though.Thanks for that.
Ok, one hurt for me, sadly i worry a lot paying for a glass optic coming from America, it a lot of transport bumps and bangs for the glass, i worry little shards hurting performance. Damn. I feel like this is a sign. Nothing letting me buy an optic glass cable. It's making me really wonder... huhhhhhh.
OCD? Maybe. But glass optics to me, sounds fragile. I would have to get one made in the UK lol. I think i'm cutting my choices mighty slim here. I know QED is made in the UK, but their quartz, glass?, cable is 5m or 3m, ughh. I might need to re-measure my run at a different angle, see if 3m will do. I'm bloody here there everywhere at the moment. I'll measure my run again... eeeee.
QED's 2 choices are polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) acrylic glass optical fibre vs quartz.
Quartz one is the expensive one. Is the PMMA glass then? Not some hybrid?
https://www.futureshop.co.uk/qed-performance-toslink-digital-optical-audio-cable-graphite
The cable in question^.
Maybe this optical thing is over, hmm. Thanks again.
Edits: 11/03/23
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Nothing wrong with optical - Jonnycorn3 18:07:49 11/03/23 (2)
- RE: Nothing wrong with optical - Dawnrazor 09:26:01 11/04/23 (1)
- RE: Nothing wrong with optical - Jonnycorn3 12:12:10 11/04/23 (0)