Inmate Central

Women might be better than men in certain "combat" roles. Operating machinery, etc...

143.109.148.201

This Post Has Been Edited by the Author

In Reply to: RE: That Pete doesn't want women serving in combat roles posted by Jazz Inmate on November 17, 2024 at 20:18:30

"Combat" is not all about the swinging of maces and swords any longer. If certain women want to fight, I say let them.
Smaller, lighter body types are sometimes better suited to the performing of certain types of physical actions. These actions might include climbing, crawling, running or cycling over long distances. Smaller bodies don't always require as much air, food, or drink as larger bodies do. Smaller bodies usually weigh less than larger bodies do. Smaller bodies can remain hidden more easily than bigger bodies can. Etc, etc, etc...
As long as these women are well-suited to the roles they can perform well and they don't hamper or interfere with men who might be better suited to performing certain other types of roles, who should care that they might want to join in on the fun ?
What bugs me sometimes ?
When certain quantities of "feminine women" are allowed to sit back while expecting to reap all of the benefits of our wonderful military/industrial/consumerist complex, without ever having to think much about it. Maybe they should be physically supporting their own keep in the battlefield, instead of sitting back preening their Dolly Parton hairdos and filing their Vampira finger nails all day long ?
Makes you want to give their fat asses a swift kick or two, just to wake them up a little ? Oh wait, I forgot... they should be staying at home having babies in order to make sure they don't turn into uncontrollable "cat women"...
Not to say that there won't be certain times when men and women should not be together in combat. It might all depend on the type of combat at hand.

Edits: 11/18/24 11/18/24 11/18/24 11/18/24 11/18/24

Follow Ups: