Home Vintage Asylum

Classic gear from yesteryear; vintage audio standing the test of time.

Re: Marantz MR 235 or Philips 796?

FRG7SWL,

I agree entirely with your assessment of the MR 235's natural presentation of guitar tone, but I would think its strengths better suit softly amplified electric guitar more than acoustic. The first time I heard this receiver, I was struck by its firm grip on the bass coming out of my Maggies. It has a subtle ability to produce controlled, tuneful lows which integrate well with the lower mids and can be a bit startling given the receiver's modest power output.

With acoustic guitar, where the presentation is lighter and balanced more toward the mids and highs, I have run into what seems to be the 235's main limitation. The foward, somewhat over-rich mids tend to blur transients in the lower treble, IMHO, leaving the upper treble to sound clear and admirably clean, but somewhat detached from the overall presentation.

I still love the MR 235's overall sound. How does this receiver compare with other units from Marantz? How much of the Marantz sound does it deliver? What is the Marantz sound?


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.