In Reply to: When ranking the "best" receivers" shouldn't price also be a factor? posted by airtime on March 8, 2007 at 18:15:43:
"Best" is only in some context. If it doesn't work in your system, it's not a "best". So each system (and that includes YOUR tastes) ought to have it's own list of bests.Sure, price matters; but "fit" matters more.
I think this whole idea of ranking components on some hierarchy is misleading at best, and disastrous at its worst.
So, for the majority of buyers it's probably #3, What ever is hot this year.
The smart money is on "whatever works best in my system"; which is probably why you have heard much less expensive receivers sound as good or better.
But you already knew that, didn't you?
Jerry
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: When ranking the "best" receivers" shouldn't price also be a factor? - Bold Eagle 06:46:49 03/09/07 (0)