Home Tape Trail

Reel to reel, cassette and other analogue tape formats.

Re: FERMO?

Hi Jon (and our friend in Spain),

The FERMO term I have never understood or worked out. Type III (Ferri/ferrochromes) were a short-lived oddity that tried to combine the low demand for head current of ferrous tapes with the low noise of the new pure CrO2 but were confounded by the problematic high gauss figures regquired for pure chromium dioxides and the consequent need for erase heads to degauss at 15VA or more. It never really came right and manufacturers (and the public) abandoned them. Pure iron particle tapes (the earliest being Sony Metallic, TDK MA and Maxell MX/Hitachi ME)were in any case introduced shortly afterwards: they demanded similar head and rec amp chacteristics but without sharing ferrous oxide in the formula with its ordinarily low 10kHz MOLs to mess things up.

Thus it seems inexplicable that FERMO might refer to either ferrichrome or metal oxide (considering that a baseline type IV is an unoxidised particle (thus not an oxide), particularly one as sophisticated as Finavinx which is highly stabilized and alloy-bound.

However, Jon, I am equally perplexed - it does seem a reasonable fit for the FERMO acronym!!

Cheers all - Marc


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  McShane Design  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • Re: FERMO? - MHugo 08:03:49 08/09/06 (0)


You can not post to an archived thread.