In Reply to: RE: Standard nomenclature for tape generations posted by c1ferrari on May 16, 2016 at 21:05:50:
Well it certainly stirred up less interest than I thought it would. There seemed to be a fairly impassioned debate about this subject some time ago when there was a lot of buzz around the eBay listing of 15ips protection copies. In any case, thanks to you three for your kind remarks. Harold
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Standard nomenclature for tape generations - hticheno 16:07:29 05/17/16 (1)
- RE: Standard nomenclature for tape generations - c1ferrari 16:26:38 05/17/16 (0)