In Reply to: dolby 363 with Cat 300 (Dolby SR). posted by Chapai on March 3, 2016 at 17:59:01:
IMHO the question is "what do you want to achive?"
All these Dolby systems were designed to reduce tape hiss. And lowering the noise floor can increase usable dynamic range a bit.
There are limits to each system. If you go beyond these limits, audible distortions become a problem.
This is only one solution to the noise floor issue.
The most popular one in studios was to use a wider tape run at a higher speed.
That's why only bedroom studios ever used cassette as a recording media.
Of course, there's absolutely no reason why you shouldn't try using it today.
I wouldn't expect much better performance than Dolby Labs got with Dolby C.
Go for if you have the spare cash!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: dolby 363 with Cat 300 (Dolby SR). - ironbut 12:51:37 03/05/16 (5)
- RE: dolby 363 with Cat 300 (Dolby SR). - Chapai 21:17:31 03/05/16 (4)
- Cassette vs R2R - Inmate51 06:34:30 03/12/16 (2)
- RE: Cassette vs R2R - Chapai 17:40:05 03/12/16 (1)
- RE: Cassette vs R2R - vintageperson 06:35:05 10/14/17 (0)
- RE: dolby 363 with Cat 300 (Dolby SR). - bshapiro 03:35:30 03/12/16 (0)