Shady Lane

RE: Is his wilful misrepresentation of MD product a graver offense than...

69.234.207.190

This Post Has Been Edited by the Author

In Reply to: RE: Is his wilful misrepresentation of MD product a graver offense than... posted by clarkjohnsen on July 24, 2007 at 12:12:49

Geoff knowingly took intellectual property that wasn't his. There is still intellectual property on his website that he shouldn't be using. He only removed my photo because I caught him in the act.
I did not post any willful misrepresentation of MD products. First of all, you would have to prove motive (an ability which you and Wellfed seem to stake authority). Second, the only possible misrepresentation I made was with the material composition of the wall cover. I still don't know for sure that it isn't some plastic polymer. However, I gave Wellfed the benefit of the doubt and promptly edited my allegedly incorrect "plastic" assertion because Wellfed claims the outlet is not made of plastic (though he failed to correct me on what it is made of).

Edits: 07/24/07

Follow Ups:

Willfull, or not, geoffkait and Len_ are a couple of bad dudes... - Wellfed 12:31:25 07/24/07 (0)