In Reply to: Re: Clueless in Switzerland posted by morricab on March 12, 2007 at 10:39:39:
"As to S/N, the measurements I have seen for a 1Khz sine wave at 1 watt show the noise floor at -125db above 1Khz for the distortion spectrum.If that is not physically impossible it's damn close. Either you are lying, or you don't know how to make the measurement. Probably both.
Once again; Morricrab: No one else except you claims measurements like that, No One.
Duh!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Interesting article. Most of it is over my head but ... - The Real Dick Hertz 17:32:48 03/08/07 (114)
- cognitive dissonance - Al Sekela 11:01:06 03/09/07 (0)
- It's good, all good. nt - clarkjohnsen 10:24:53 03/09/07 (0)
- Hopefully this will provide those who measure the impetus to do so - kerr 04:40:11 03/09/07 (0)
- Re: Interesting article. Most of it is over my head but ... - Dan Banquer 04:27:45 03/09/07 (96)
- Re: Interesting article. Most of it is over my head but ... - morricab 06:36:37 03/09/07 (72)
- Re: Interesting article. Most of it is over my head but ... - Dan Banquer 07:18:51 03/10/07 (67)
- Re: Interesting article. Most of it is over my head but ... - morricab 03:11:54 03/11/07 (66)
- Ingnorance abounds and your propaganda is baseless. - Dan Banquer 04:38:08 03/12/07 (38)
- Re: Ingnorance abounds and your propaganda is baseless. - morricab 08:02:40 03/12/07 (31)
- Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 16:12:21 03/12/07 (21)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 13:58:39 03/14/07 (14)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 16:52:57 03/14/07 (13)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 03:31:58 03/15/07 (5)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 13:12:40 03/15/07 (3)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 17:45:44 03/15/07 (1)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 20:23:42 03/15/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 15:11:57 03/15/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 11:17:07 03/15/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 19:50:02 03/14/07 (6)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 03:18:19 03/15/07 (1)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 11:40:53 03/15/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 20:03:02 03/14/07 (3)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 00:07:08 03/15/07 (2)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 03:24:37 03/15/07 (1)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 11:14:47 03/15/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - theaudiohobby 19:02:02 03/13/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 02:30:31 03/13/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 16:55:55 03/12/07 (3)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 17:08:55 03/12/07 (2)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 09:30:56 03/13/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 03:04:23 03/13/07 (0)
- Clueless in Switzerland - Dan Banquer 08:25:57 03/12/07 (8)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - morricab 08:37:59 03/12/07 (7)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - Dan Banquer 09:00:33 03/12/07 (6)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - morricab 10:39:39 03/12/07 (5)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - Dan Banquer 10:54:55 03/12/07 (4)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - morricab 11:10:33 03/12/07 (3)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - Dan Banquer 11:32:12 03/12/07 (2)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - morricab 14:15:48 03/12/07 (1)
- If you want to stick your foot in your mouth........... - Dan Banquer 09:15:03 03/13/07 (1)
- P.S. - Dan Banquer 07:30:08 03/12/07 (5)
- Re: P.S. - morricab 08:33:11 03/12/07 (4)
- Re: P.S. - Dan Banquer 09:25:14 03/12/07 (3)
- Re: P.S. - morricab 11:00:47 03/12/07 (2)
- Bwahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! - Dan Banquer 12:55:39 03/12/07 (1)
- Re: Bwahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! - morricab 14:05:36 03/12/07 (0)
- For some reason, Dan prefers arguing to the wall about what he imagines - E-Stat 20:20:33 03/11/07 (26)
- I Imagine nothing. - Dan Banquer 04:40:09 03/12/07 (25)
- Right, Dan - E-Stat 06:19:20 03/12/07 (24)
- Yes I am right. - Dan Banquer 06:41:31 03/12/07 (23)
- You can't even remember what we're talking about! - E-Stat 06:55:55 03/12/07 (22)
- You have already demonstrated that you don't have a technical clue! - Dan Banquer 07:36:39 03/12/07 (21)
- Re: You have already demonstrated that you don't have a technical clue! - morricab 08:40:54 03/12/07 (5)
- Re: You have already demonstrated that you don't have a technical clue! - Dan Banquer 09:03:03 03/12/07 (4)
- Correction! - Dan Banquer 09:16:32 03/12/07 (3)
- Re: Correction! - morricab 11:15:48 03/12/07 (2)
- Re: Correction! - Dan Banquer 12:07:26 03/12/07 (1)
- Re: Correction! - morricab 14:46:45 03/12/07 (0)
- P.S. - Dan Banquer 08:22:42 03/12/07 (14)
- Cite your sources - E-Stat 09:58:46 03/12/07 (13)
- Re: Cite your sources - Dan Banquer 10:07:38 03/12/07 (12)
- Actually I find it pointless to debate your imagination - E-Stat 10:12:52 03/12/07 (11)
- Redundancy is not necessary, Redundancy is not necessary, & Redundancy is not necessary. nt - Dan Banquer 10:22:12 03/12/07 (10)
- Fine - E-Stat 10:25:07 03/12/07 (9)
- Re: Fine - Dan Banquer 10:40:36 03/12/07 (8)
- Sure - E-Stat 10:54:08 03/12/07 (7)
- Re: Sure - Dan Banquer 11:06:02 03/12/07 (5)
- You first - E-Stat 11:16:10 03/12/07 (4)
- Re: You first - Dan Banquer 11:26:37 03/12/07 (3)
- I can't take anyone seriously - E-Stat 11:32:26 03/12/07 (2)
- I'm learning :) - Dan Banquer 12:02:53 03/12/07 (1)
- The lack of substantiation for your claims so noted (nt) - E-Stat 12:28:45 03/12/07 (0)
- Re: Sure - Dan Banquer 10:57:57 03/12/07 (0)
- Hard to argue - Jim Austin 07:09:59 03/09/07 (3)
- Re: Hard to argue - john curl 01:12:06 03/10/07 (1)
- Sorry, I don't get your meaning - Jim Austin 03:39:58 03/10/07 (0)
- Re: Hard to argue - morricab 09:47:01 03/09/07 (0)
- This interpretation is much too simple - Jim Austin 06:29:42 03/09/07 (22)
- Re: This interpretation is much too simple - Dan Banquer 09:14:30 03/09/07 (13)
- ...and your point is? - Jim Austin 09:25:43 03/09/07 (12)
- Re: ...and your point is? - Dan Banquer 09:57:59 03/09/07 (11)
- Okay, I get it - Jim Austin 10:13:24 03/09/07 (10)
- Re: Okay, I get it - john curl 02:39:27 03/10/07 (7)
- I used Horowitz and Hill... - Jim Austin 03:41:36 03/10/07 (6)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - john curl 10:49:42 03/10/07 (5)
- This book looks interestin - Jim Austin 09:16:08 03/11/07 (1)
- Re: This book looks interestin - john curl 12:00:48 03/11/07 (0)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - Jim Austin 14:13:22 03/10/07 (2)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - john curl 17:10:23 03/10/07 (1)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - Jim Austin 18:16:43 03/10/07 (0)
- Re: Okay, I get it - Dan Banquer 10:23:18 03/09/07 (1)
- Maybe I shouldn't say this... - Jim Austin 10:33:23 03/09/07 (0)
- Re: This interpretation is much too simple - theaudiohobby 06:59:44 03/09/07 (7)
- Re: This interpretation is much too simple - morricab 09:48:38 03/09/07 (0)
- I don't totally disagree... - Jim Austin 07:06:59 03/09/07 (5)
- The problem with numbers... - morricab 09:57:32 03/09/07 (1)
- I would only add - Jim Austin 10:09:32 03/09/07 (0)
- Re: Well.. - theaudiohobby 07:53:14 03/09/07 (2)
- Re: Well.. - Jim Austin 08:05:29 03/09/07 (1)
- Re: Well.. - theaudiohobby 08:12:30 03/09/07 (0)
- Re: Well, it does address a few issues - theaudiohobby 02:22:18 03/09/07 (3)
- Re: Well, it does address a few issues - morricab 06:38:35 03/09/07 (2)
- Re: Well, it does address a few issues - AJinFLA 16:16:58 03/09/07 (1)
- Re: too funny -nt - theaudiohobby 01:05:35 03/10/07 (0)
- Let's hear it for the perverts! (nt) - E-Stat 20:25:36 03/08/07 (8)
- And once again................. - Dan Banquer 05:29:46 03/09/07 (6)
- I guess we perverts just can't read very well - E-Stat 05:39:03 03/09/07 (5)
- Re: I guess we perverts just can't read very well - Dan Banquer 05:52:00 03/09/07 (4)
- Re: I guess we perverts just can't read very well - morricab 06:32:07 03/09/07 (0)
- I can recommend a good book to improve your memory retention. - E-Stat 06:08:23 03/09/07 (2)
- The first step to recovery is................. - Dan Banquer 06:18:06 03/09/07 (1)
- Indeed - E-Stat 06:22:30 03/09/07 (0)
- Thank you - thank you very much! - kerr 04:42:04 03/09/07 (0)
- Uh-oh (nt) - AJinFLA 18:02:47 03/08/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - Dan Banquer 10:54:55 03/12/07 (4)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - morricab 11:10:33 03/12/07 (3)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - Dan Banquer 11:32:12 03/12/07 (2)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - morricab 14:15:48 03/12/07 (1)
- If you want to stick your foot in your mouth........... - Dan Banquer 09:15:03 03/13/07 (1)