In Reply to: I linked to a post of mine that gives the citation, for God's sake! posted by Pat D on June 2, 2006 at 05:18:51:
a
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - I must admit that I have just found out that this was a dedicated DBT page - Norm 12:20:39 06/01/06 (93)
- Been there, done that. - Pat D 13:24:35 06/01/06 (20)
- Okay I have reviewed the references you gave and reread the article cited. Yes IMD could not be a criticism - Norm 12:27:51 06/02/06 (7)
- Was IMD controlled for in the previous studies? - Pat D 17:56:07 06/02/06 (6)
- The article is not by Kaoru and Shogu, does not use graduate students, and does avoid IMD. - Norm 20:44:38 06/02/06 (5)
- Re: The article is not by Kaoru and Shogu, does not use graduate students, and does avoid IMD. - Pat D 18:15:36 06/03/06 (4)
- As jj would say, do the research. I gave the full citation. nt - Norm 20:28:34 06/03/06 (3)
- I ask again, how did they eliminate IMD in the speakers - Pat D 21:33:21 06/03/06 (2)
- The HFC alone went through the supertweeters and no one heard it when it was played alone - Norm 09:06:55 06/04/06 (1)
- That's a good argument. - Pat D 16:04:46 06/04/06 (0)
- That is correct - Soundmind 15:34:59 06/01/06 (11)
- I am afraid I do not understand this. - Norm 17:03:06 06/01/06 (8)
- Can you guys just give me the citation? - Norm 20:20:02 06/01/06 (5)
- I linked to a post of mine that gives the citation, for God's sake! - Pat D 05:18:51 06/02/06 (3)
- You did but nothing comes up. nt - Norm 06:16:14 06/02/06 (2)
- The link comes up on my browsers. - Pat D 06:53:34 06/02/06 (1)
- Thanks. nt - Norm 07:05:13 06/02/06 (0)
- What needs to be done... - andy_c 20:42:05 06/01/06 (0)
- Let's expand on this a bit more - andy_c 18:56:36 06/01/06 (0)
- IMD... - real_jj 18:08:24 06/01/06 (0)
- This brings out another point along the way... - real_jj 16:19:04 06/01/06 (0)
- Re: That is correct - Pat D 15:39:34 06/01/06 (0)
- Did your friend also tell you... - KlausR. 13:13:00 06/01/06 (65)
- are page fees not charged for all publications in psychology? - Norm 14:22:00 06/01/06 (64)
- Is it bad research? - KlausR. 01:58:30 06/02/06 (63)
- "jj knows better." That's what *he* says. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:38:59 06/02/06 (61)
- jj - KlausR. 08:17:52 06/02/06 (60)
- Re: Why don't we - geoffkait 09:48:43 06/02/06 (54)
- Why don't you provide some evidence for your claims? - real_jj 11:38:40 06/02/06 (53)
- Re: "...and several scientists I've talked to..." - geoffkait 13:07:53 06/02/06 (48)
- Sorry, dear, but you have to accept the facts. - real_jj 13:44:02 06/02/06 (47)
- Re: The opinion? Oh, really? - geoffkait 14:18:36 06/02/06 (46)
- You don't have to like it, but that's how it is... - real_jj 17:11:01 06/02/06 (45)
- Re: "You don't have to like it" - geoffkait 18:20:26 06/02/06 (44)
- Well, actually, I was waiting to see if your chip would get into a Challenge test... - real_jj 18:38:00 06/02/06 (43)
- Re: 1M Dollar Challenge - geoffkait 03:07:15 06/03/06 (42)
- Tell it to Sylvia, mate, tell it to the fortune tellers... - real_jj 12:04:03 06/05/06 (41)
- Re: Ooo, that tickles - geoffkait 06:59:52 06/06/06 (40)
- Well, fella, I guess you just don't want to try for a million dollars... - real_jj 08:28:32 06/06/06 (39)
- Just think... - Wellfed 13:17:52 06/09/06 (2)
- Re: Just think... - arminia 17:58:15 06/09/06 (1)
- I'm banned for life... - Wellfed 21:16:07 06/09/06 (0)
- Re: You are so - geoffkait 09:28:17 06/06/06 (35)
- So, don't want to try for the million, eh? - real_jj 11:54:23 06/06/06 (34)
- Re: Now, why on Earth - geoffkait 12:14:46 06/06/06 (33)
- For a million dollars. Guess you don't think you could win it... - real_jj 13:26:02 06/06/06 (32)
- Re: Deal of the Century - geoffkait 14:27:15 06/06/06 (3)
- Re: Deal of the Century - BJB 15:17:57 06/06/06 (2)
- Re: Deal of the Century - Paulhoff 16:34:37 06/07/06 (1)
- I believe the money is there... - Wellfed 09:29:36 06/08/06 (0)
- Re: For a million dollars. Guess you don't think you could win it... - Paulhoff 13:39:20 06/06/06 (27)
- Re: For a million dollars. Guess you don't think you could win it... - geoffkait 13:58:49 06/06/06 (26)
- Re: For a million dollars. Guess you don't think you could win it... - BJB 14:18:47 06/06/06 (25)
- Re: "Why don't you take the test?" - geoffkait 14:53:30 06/06/06 (24)
- Re: "Why don't you take the test?" - BJB 15:19:23 06/06/06 (23)
- Our own Wellfed's amazing experiences with the Amazing One have been well-documented here on AA. - clarkjohnsen 07:58:41 06/08/06 (0)
- Re: "James Randi is not a scam artist" - geoffkait 05:40:22 06/07/06 (10)
- Oh HO! Audiophile tweaks are not fair game, but faith healers are? - real_jj 10:16:57 06/07/06 (9)
- Re: I am subject to verification, you silly goose... - geoffkait 11:01:49 06/07/06 (8)
- Really now. Please enlighten us, how does Randi run the challenge? - real_jj 14:16:35 06/07/06 (7)
- Re: "He gets a Subject Matter expert" - geoffkait 14:38:31 06/07/06 (6)
- Excuse me, but you are spouting nonsense. Why not try for the million, instead? - real_jj 15:07:34 06/07/06 (5)
- Re: Thanks for the offer, and If I feel the - geoffkait 15:37:45 06/07/06 (0)
- Re: Excuse me, but you are spouting nonsense. Why not try for the million, instead? - Paulhoff 15:35:11 06/07/06 (3)
- Re: Ah... and you must be the - geoffkait 15:44:24 06/07/06 (2)
- Re: Ah... and you must be the - Paulhoff 16:31:38 06/07/06 (1)
- Re: That's nice as I always - geoffkait 03:24:06 06/08/06 (0)
- Re: "Why don't you take the test?" - Paulhoff 18:33:56 06/06/06 (10)
- Re: Please try to - geoffkait 03:47:03 06/07/06 (9)
- Perhaps you should stick to aeronautical engineering? - real_jj 10:18:26 06/07/06 (8)
- Re: Perhaps you should stick to - geoffkait 11:06:33 06/07/06 (7)
- So, don't want a million dollars, eh? Or is it you figure you can't win? - real_jj 14:17:16 06/07/06 (6)
- Re: I don't cotton to - geoffkait 14:32:39 06/07/06 (5)
- So, you're saying that Randi is a Deadbeat? Or a Hornswaggler? - real_jj 15:08:38 06/07/06 (4)
- Re: So, you're saying that Randi is a Deadbeat? Or a Hornswaggler? - Paulhoff 15:37:06 06/07/06 (3)
- Re: I know, I know... - geoffkait 16:21:52 06/07/06 (2)
- Re: I know, I know... - Paulhoff 16:33:29 06/07/06 (1)
- Re: I know, I know... - geoffkait 17:04:31 06/07/06 (0)
- You obviously asked the wrong physicists. - jneutron 12:45:10 06/02/06 (3)
- Re: "I asked the right physicist...he did not laugh" - geoffkait 12:57:41 06/02/06 (2)
- Re: "I asked the right physicist...he did not laugh" - jneutron 13:16:40 06/02/06 (1)
- Re: Speaking of happy hour - geoffkait 13:34:51 06/02/06 (0)
- My biography is irrelevant. And thanks for affirming my point: jj always knows better. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:35:28 06/02/06 (4)
- Did I say "always"? - KlausR. 11:44:04 06/02/06 (3)
- "It's quite unfortunate (for you) that I know people who know you and your biography." - clarkjohnsen 08:30:43 06/03/06 (2)
- Amen, I guess engineers do not appreciate that authority has little role in science. nt - Norm 12:36:36 06/03/06 (1)
- Nasty stereotyping there, Norm... - real_jj 12:06:46 06/05/06 (0)
- Thanks for the reference. I don't know what to think about criticism about delay in publication. nt - Norm 06:22:44 06/02/06 (0)
- hmmm - jneutron 12:47:56 06/01/06 (5)
- In that particular study, check out the listening conditions :) - real_jj 12:49:24 06/01/06 (4)
- No need. - jneutron 13:07:07 06/01/06 (3)
- Actually, there is a need to look into the listening conditions... - real_jj 14:38:09 06/01/06 (2)
- I doubt if you have read it. nt - Norm 20:47:44 06/02/06 (1)
- Prove your claim, stalker... - real_jj 12:08:44 06/05/06 (0)
Follow Ups
- You did but nothing comes up. nt - Norm 06:16:14 06/02/06 (2)
- The link comes up on my browsers. - Pat D 06:53:34 06/02/06 (1)
- Thanks. nt - Norm 07:05:13 06/02/06 (0)