Re: Thanks for the information - okiemax

Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Predicting in a DBT - okiemax 20:38:21 05/27/06 (40)

Re: Predicting in a DBT(correction) - okiemax 09:53:18 05/28/06 (5)

And test administrators... - real_jj 22:30:01 05/28/06 (4)

Re: And test administrators... - okiemax 08:46:08 05/29/06 (3)

There are a variety of tests one can do on the actual data - real_jj 10:55:19 05/29/06 (2)

Re: There are a variety of tests one can do on the actual data - okiemax 11:42:47 05/30/06 (1)

You'd be surprised what subjects do... :) - real_jj 12:22:08 05/30/06 (0)

Re: Predicting in a DBT - Todd Krieger 22:48:05 05/27/06 (2)

Re: Predicting in a DBT - okiemax 00:37:40 05/28/06 (1)

"Imagination is MORE important than knowledge.." by Albert Einstein.(nt) - cheap-Jack 13:07:56 05/29/06 (0)

Subject is unaware of any distribution - Caymus 21:05:02 05/27/06 (30)

Re: Subject is unaware of any distribution - okiemax 23:48:23 05/27/06 (15)

Re: Subject is unaware of any distribution - mls-stl 08:06:34 05/29/06 (0)

The point of blind testing is to eliminate prejudicial influences - Caymus 10:37:20 05/28/06 (8)

Re: The point of blind testing is to eliminate prejudicial influences - okiemax 12:08:05 05/28/06 (7)

Re: This isn't a double blind test - mls-stl 08:14:10 05/29/06 (6)

Re: Not double-blind? - okiemax 10:08:28 05/29/06 (5)

Re: Not double-blind? - mls-stl 14:38:34 05/29/06 (4)

Re: Not double-blind? - okiemax 19:28:34 05/29/06 (3)

Re: Not double-blind? - mls-stl 19:59:02 05/30/06 (2)

Re: P value threshold - okiemax 07:57:56 05/31/06 (1)

Re: P value threshold - mls-stl 16:06:39 05/31/06 (0)

Re: Subject is unaware of any distribution - hitsware 08:01:41 05/28/06 (4)

Re: Unlikley - okiemax 08:42:10 05/28/06 (3)

Re: Unlikley - mls-stl 08:20:50 05/29/06 (0)

Re: Unlikley - Ted Smith 09:07:12 05/28/06 (1)

Re: Thanks for the information - okiemax 09:22:03 05/28/06 (0)

Re: Subject is unaware of any distribution - Ted Smith 22:47:40 05/27/06 (2)

Re: Subject is unaware of any distribution - Caymus 23:11:50 05/27/06 (1)

That's what controls are for - real_jj 10:29:18 05/30/06 (0)

Re: Subject is unaware of any distribution - Todd Krieger 22:30:32 05/27/06 (10)

I agree - audiophile ego is the real issue - Caymus 23:06:14 05/27/06 (9)

Humans are strategic thinkers. Your comments are grossly unscientific prejudgments. nt - Norm 08:37:27 05/28/06 (8)

The original post said the subject was "predicting" the correct answers - Caymus 09:46:40 05/28/06 (7)

You are naive if you expect subjects are not guessing your intent - Norm 10:12:01 05/28/06 (3)

Then you agree expectations can involuntarily influence what we hear! - Caymus 10:51:49 05/28/06 (2)

No, you need to expect that you are being gamed in an experiment. - Norm 11:27:48 05/28/06 (1)

Uh uh... - real_jj 09:54:24 06/01/06 (0)

When taking a test I often think of other things than the sound itself - Ted Smith 09:54:56 05/28/06 (2)

In same/different tests, I get flummoxed and neglect to relax and enjoy the music - Norm 11:41:57 05/28/06 (1)

First step in a test, get comfortable... - real_jj 10:32:29 05/31/06 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Thanks for the information - okiemax 09:22:03 05/28/06 (0)