|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: I propose an Intelligent Chip Asylum posted by Paul_A on May 7, 2005 at 14:47:21:
...as long as it were a DBT free zone anyway. ;-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - HiFi News reviews the intelligent chip... - Guy F 11:16:43 05/06/05 (110)
- I can refurbish Intelligent Chips to work like new for a moderate fee. - Tom Dawson 01:13:39 05/14/05 (1)
- I hear dunkin 'em in liquid nitrogen helps! - Pat D 06:26:47 05/14/05 (0)
- Well, it's good it went here instead of WW; on the other hand, it's upside down. Weird. nt - markrohr 11:42:06 05/09/05 (2)
- They can fix that if they bounce it twice. Too much trouble I guess. (nt) - vacuous 14:41:53 05/09/05 (1)
- Maybe if we put it through an inverse RIAA EQ circuit . . . oh crap, it's digital. nt - markrohr 17:33:51 05/09/05 (0)
- Another one who didn't get the memo. nt - markrohr 11:46:37 05/06/05 (2)
- What the memo said: ... - vacuous 12:45:21 05/06/05 (1)
- Sorry folks, must`ve been asleep when that memo was sent out. (nt) - Guy F 05:28:57 05/07/05 (0)
- And in related news... - AlphaGeek 12:02:45 05/06/05 (2)
- The world is an awfully large place... - Wellfed 12:08:06 05/06/05 (1)
- I guess you're from another planet - Feanor 17:14:18 05/06/05 (0)
- Re: HiFi News reviews the intelligent chip... - Wellfed 12:04:50 05/06/05 (4)
- There`s nothing wrong with a little tweak here or there, but.. - Guy F 05:26:07 05/07/05 (3)
- Re: There`s nothing wrong with a little tweak here or there, but.. - Wellfed 08:37:57 05/07/05 (2)
- Re: Yes, but.. - Jim Willis 07:48:50 05/08/05 (1)
- Still in Randi's vault apparently... - Wellfed 13:24:31 05/08/05 (0)
- I bet it's wasn't DBT. - porky_pig_jr 12:36:59 05/06/05 (5)
- Re: I bet it's wasn't DBT. - AlphaGeek 12:54:12 05/06/05 (4)
- Stack of QUARTERS? - porky_pig_jr 15:47:39 05/06/05 (0)
- $.49 tweak - Kloss 16:17:32 05/06/05 (2)
- forgot $.05 - Kloss 16:21:04 05/06/05 (0)
- 8¢ WAF tweek - DAT 20:28:45 05/06/05 (0)
- Isn't this supposed to be on Whiners' Woad? nt - clarkjohnsen 12:46:28 05/06/05 (25)
- Yea, what is wrong with you Clark? Do you have bo or is just because you voted for Bush? nt - Norm 13:19:18 05/06/05 (7)
- Re: Yea, what is wrong with you Clark? Do you have bo or is just because you voted for Bush? nt - jesasking 17:43:51 05/06/05 (4)
- Jeez, jmikes, if you're so ashamed of a post you won't put your name to it . . . - markrohr 05:37:33 05/07/05 (3)
- One computer, one user rule repealed - jesasking 06:12:54 05/07/05 (2)
- Well, of course, that's *possible.* Both at AA? That's *possible,* too. Both with the same 'tude? . . . . . . nah. nt - markrohr 07:51:43 05/07/05 (0)
- CAUGHT! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:08:56 05/07/05 (0)
- Actually - sjb 18:39:04 05/06/05 (1)
- You are correct, I did not vote for Bush. - clarkjohnsen 09:08:04 05/07/05 (0)
- Clark, your muzzle has slipped off. Silence! - vacuous 15:31:57 05/06/05 (5)
- Re: Clark, your muzzle has slipped off. Silence! LOL roaring! (nt) - Mike Mount 21:48:45 05/06/05 (0)
- "[Bruce has] now given Clark a broad avenue for legal action against AA." Wow! - clarkjohnsen 09:27:48 05/07/05 (3)
- Bruce's scalp would be enough ... - vacuous 12:09:39 05/07/05 (2)
- Ohh! Ahh! My name appears but I can neither defend nor explain myself. Cozy arrangement he's got over there. nt - clarkjohnsen 13:32:10 05/07/05 (1)
- Maybe we should request the thread be sent to Whiner's Woad? (nt) - vacuous 13:42:46 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Isn't this supposed to be on Whiners' Woad? nt - john curl 22:47:56 05/06/05 (4)
- Don't you mean "Clarken and the Art of Debachery"? - Guy 04:40:19 05/07/05 (0)
- "Virtually EVERY ONE of these points has been used on this website." You noticed! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:24:11 05/07/05 (1)
- But what he doesn't seem to notice... - Steve Eddy 11:32:00 05/07/05 (0)
- For those who missed it, the ZEN... AND THE ART OF DEBUNKERY thread... - clarkjohnsen 09:35:43 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Isn't this supposed to be on Whiners' Woad? nt - Guy F 07:56:16 05/07/05 (2)
- I was being droll -- i.e. just kidding. Had *I* been the one to post it, that's where it would have landed. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:22:32 05/07/05 (1)
- Clark - no problemo! (nt) - Guy F 10:31:09 05/08/05 (0)
- Gotta agree. What's good for the goose.... though I'd put it on Tweaks or Prop Head. nt - Rick W 08:25:57 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: or place this thread - related topics on REDICULOUS NOTIONS section. (nt) - Mike Mount 09:19:02 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Or maybe "Shady Lane"? nt - Jim Willis 07:50:01 05/08/05 (0)
- Tried the pebble thing. This is more satisfying... - musetap 12:49:13 05/06/05 (3)
- Re: Tried the pebble thing. This is more satisfying...bear with me... - Mike Mount 22:32:14 05/06/05 (2)
- More like delusion and hysteria - Grillcloth 04:06:56 05/07/05 (1)
- Joan d'Clark? (nt) - Al Sekela 08:20:56 05/07/05 (0)
- intelligent chip...how does the micro chip get power? - Kloss 12:54:29 05/06/05 (2)
- God -nt- - jesasking 17:39:22 05/06/05 (0)
- Re: intelligent chip...snake oil! Mood rings pulsate around chip - Mike Mount 21:46:36 05/06/05 (0)
- I actually know how it works! - Blues_man 13:53:43 05/06/05 (6)
- it works? - Kloss 14:03:42 05/06/05 (4)
- Re: it works? - QuadTodd 20:29:41 05/06/05 (3)
- yes but - Kloss 20:56:59 05/06/05 (2)
- Re: yes but - QuadTodd 09:02:53 05/07/05 (1)
- lol - Kloss 05:13:37 05/08/05 (0)
- Please recall that your system isn't any good; you just think it does. nt - Norm 14:35:14 05/06/05 (0)
- John Atkinson, OTOH, calls it a fraud. - rupertdacat 15:39:29 05/06/05 (12)
- No he doesn't - Eric_Cartman 15:02:37 05/23/05 (0)
- It was me - Jim Austin 15:34:01 05/16/05 (0)
- OMIGOD! - porky_pig_jr 15:51:39 05/06/05 (0)
- Did John Atkinson even try the device before making his proclamation? [nt] - Wellfed 16:01:31 05/06/05 (0)
- Wrong JA. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:20:59 05/07/05 (6)
- Re: Wrong JA. nt / Mr. Johnsen, a suggestion if I may... - Guy 11:10:31 05/07/05 (5)
- Still the wrong JA, but I shall take your suggestion underadvisement. However... - clarkjohnsen 13:36:34 05/07/05 (4)
- Correction... - Wellfed 18:32:02 05/07/05 (2)
- Says who? - Rick W 20:01:57 05/07/05 (1)
- I haven't kept up with recent numbers... - Wellfed 21:41:48 05/07/05 (0)
- How you do silence a majority view? Also, my "liking" of the issue is not the issue. - Guy 05:02:38 05/08/05 (0)
- That's the thing, isn't it? - Feanor 06:37:06 05/09/05 (0)
- Ken Kessler thinks EVERTHING sounds great! - Shane from AUS 15:58:41 05/06/05 (1)
- REALLY! - Timbo in Oz 20:52:28 05/07/05 (0)
- I bet if CJ posted this it would have been booted to WW – I wonder what consistency means? ~t - three_sox 17:17:53 05/06/05 (1)
- I guess the moderators are having the day off -nt - chris_w 15:29:11 05/07/05 (0)
- Stop buying all magazines -- that is the real snake-oil in this industry! - RGA 19:09:51 05/06/05 (3)
- Damning all magazines smacks of a simplistic reaction rather than discerning analysis. -- NT - lancelot 19:42:18 05/06/05 (1)
- No such thing as "discerning analysis" by those who refuse to listen. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:19:55 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Stop buying all magazines -- that is the real snake-oil in this industry! - RobertB53 21:35:41 05/06/05 (0)
- Re: intelligent chip reviews...please...buy better gear! - Mike Mount 21:14:23 05/06/05 (5)
- If the gear were impervious to tweaks, we'd buy it. Until then . . . nt - markrohr 07:47:33 05/07/05 (0)
- Or spend the equivalent time and money on real tweaks! - Al Sekela 08:16:35 05/07/05 (1)
- Re: Or spend the equivalent time and money on real tweaks!... Ditto ! - Mike Mount 09:00:00 05/07/05 (0)
- Summary of your argument: "THAT CAN'T BE!" LOL. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:18:45 05/07/05 (1)
- Re: Summary of your argument: ARE YOU O.K. CLARK??? (nt) - Mike Mount 14:35:32 05/07/05 (0)
- Why sure young Johnny, I remember. Was back in '05 think it was ....... - Elmo 05:07:31 05/07/05 (4)
- Gee willikers Elmo, are ya sayin` vinyl beats CD? Guess there`s gonna be an ol` fashion lynchin` `round `ere! (nt) - Guy F 05:33:01 05/07/05 (1)
- I like Ken Kessler, always have. - Elmo 06:10:01 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: where'd you get a picture of my brother? -nt- - darkstar 06:05:27 05/07/05 (0)
- "Ol' Clarkie started it as I recall." No, the fires were blazing before I poured on the accelerant. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:17:23 05/07/05 (0)
- Bush claims that Iraq has hidden stockpiles of ICs - Paul_A 08:13:57 05/07/05 (0)
- Geoff/Clark -- where were you? Why no demo of this revolutionary tweak at the Show last week? nt - Rick W 12:56:13 05/07/05 (1)
- Re: Geoff/Clark -- where were you? Oooooo GREAT question?? ! (nt) - Mike Mount 18:17:07 05/07/05 (0)
- I propose an Intelligent Chip Asylum - Paul_A 14:47:21 05/07/05 (2)
- That would be luxurious ... - Wellfed 18:23:54 05/07/05 (0)
- Isolating this topic is apparently futile. - soulfood 07:20:29 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: HiFi News reviews the intelligent chip... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 15:05:00 05/07/05 (1)
- Reviews of the intelligent chip...Guilty Hear! (sp) of being closed minded. - Mike Mount 15:43:32 05/07/05 (0)
- After participating in tests of the chip in three systems ... - Dave Pogue 19:13:18 05/07/05 (3)
- Whenever Dave Pogue posts... - TeddiJackEddie 05:29:50 05/08/05 (1)
- Well, I'm flattered but ... - Dave Pogue 05:41:29 05/08/05 (0)
- Breaking News! Dave (may have) figured out how the chip is powered!! - Mike Mount 08:22:37 05/08/05 (0)
- Is there any 'tweak' product that audiophiles have flat out rejected? - BeatSomeSenseIntoYa 09:38:24 05/08/05 (3)
- I think this might qualify... - sunnysal 21:34:54 05/11/05 (0)
- Re: Is there any 'tweak' product that audiophiles have flat out rejected? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:58:08 05/08/05 (1)
- Re: Is there any 'tweak' product that audiophiles have flat out rejected? - BeatSomeSenseIntoYa 11:21:30 05/08/05 (0)
Follow Ups
- That would be luxurious ... - Wellfed 18:23:54 05/07/05 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
