A number of high-end manufacturers (dCS and Burmeister, perhaps others) offer transports and DACs that can be synced to one clock (in the DAC for both Burm. and dCS). I have also noted that a fair amount of professional digital gear has the provision for clock 'slaving' to an external unit, so that one master clock serves as clock for a bunch of components.How often are these master clocks typically employed in professional environments? And are the jitter-reduction and/or other sonic benefits of such a setup significant in the opinions of many engineers?
Thanks -
Mike
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Are the sonic benefits of clock-syncing signficant? - High-end Dreamer 19:31:45 03/23/02 (10)
- YES! Pro Tools example - NYCProAudioNut 10:12:40 03/29/02 (0)
- Re: Are the sonic benefits of clock-syncing signficant? - Frost 10:35:48 03/26/02 (0)
- Re: Are the sonic benefits of clock-syncing signficant? - Max 02:30:15 03/26/02 (4)
- Re: Are the sonic benefits of clock-syncing signficant? - High-end Dreamer 10:26:41 03/26/02 (3)
- Re: Are the sonic benefits of clock-syncing signficant? - Max 14:43:33 03/26/02 (2)
- Re: Are the sonic benefits of clock-syncing signficant? - Gotta disagree here. 14:22:28 03/27/02 (1)
- Re: Are the sonic benefits of clock-syncing signficant? - Roland Clarke 15:12:49 03/27/02 (0)
- Re: Are the sonic benefits of clock-syncing signficant? - Roland 14:36:41 03/24/02 (2)
- Re: Are the sonic benefits of clock-syncing signficant? - High-end Dreamer 16:18:03 03/24/02 (1)
- Re: Are the sonic benefits of clock-syncing signficant? - Roland 10:03:55 03/25/02 (0)