In Reply to: Recording at high-resolution, dithering to Red Book Standards posted by Marantzguy on May 11, 2006 at 15:43:51:
Dithered or not, an asynchronous sample-rate "downconversion" from 24/96 to 16/44 will be lossy compared to just sampling at 16/44 in the first place. The 16/44 data is calculated off of an interpolated 24/96 signal will not be as true to the original signal as a direct A/D to 16/44.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Asynchronous Sample Rate Conversion..... - Todd Krieger 21:31:34 05/12/06 (6)
- While all rate conversions are lossy... - real_jj 12:51:16 05/25/06 (0)
- No thats not an issue with Synchronous Rate Conversion - jcox 20:35:15 05/15/06 (3)
- Re: No thats not an issue with Synchronous Rate Conversion - Todd Krieger 01:27:01 05/16/06 (0)
- You are aware of "fast convolution" aren't you? - real_jj 12:54:26 05/25/06 (0)
- I haven't been inside any DAW code so I can't say what's used - jcox 10:23:41 05/16/06 (0)
- Yes, that's certainly true, but it may not be a significant issue... - Bersani 20:51:10 05/13/06 (0)