In Reply to: 6C41 - same septar socket as 6C33 posted by andy evans on July 21, 2002 at 14:06:56:
You have a good point. I suspect it's because the 6C41 not quite up to the 6AS7Gs performance, in terms of plate dissipation and plate resistance and more importantly, the septar sockets take up a lot of real estate.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 6C41 - same septar socket as 6C33 - mark 15:34:03 07/21/02 (9)
- Re: 6C41 - same septar socket as 6C33 - andy evans 01:54:59 07/22/02 (8)
- Re: 6C41 - same septar socket as 6C33 - mark 05:37:21 07/22/02 (7)
- Re: 6C41 - same septar socket as 6C33 - andy evans 13:41:51 07/22/02 (6)
- Re: 6C41 - same septar socket as 6C33 - mark 14:13:46 07/22/02 (5)
- 6C33 - the cooler alternative? - andy evans 07:17:35 07/24/02 (4)
- Re: 6C33 - the cooler alternative? - Travis 16:35:14 07/24/02 (2)
- Re: 6C33 - the cooler alternative? - Al Sekela 19:44:37 07/24/02 (1)
- Re: 6C33 - the cooler alternative? - Travis 21:03:13 07/24/02 (0)
- Re: 6C33 - the cooler alternative? - Al Sekela 09:16:19 07/24/02 (0)