In Reply to: Re: MP3 and M60 MkII impedence match...... posted by John Harper on July 21, 2000 at 08:27:59:
>Sorry, but this is nonsense. A signal is balanced as long
>as it has equal excursion in opposite directions either side
>of AC ground, at the same impedance. Using an active
>differential output (diff pair, diff opamp, pair of opamps,
>whatever) is just fine.You're right... but how do you get *exactly* the same
impedance on both outputs? On integrated circuits, you
can get very close, but with discrete devices, I don't
think so...>>Check out the whitepapers on
>>http://www.jensen-transformers.com
>
>There couldn't possibly be any bias here, now could there?Don't you think that you should read the papers before making
that judgement? Specially those that present solutions
whithout coupling transformers...>With regard to the original question, at RF (VHF+) it is very important
>to have a sink impedance equal to the source impedance, otherwise
>reflections occur and mess up the signal. At audio frequencies
>the only thing that matters is to keep the sink impedance well
>above the source impedance, to avoid frequency-dependent loading.
>If you want to experiment with this, you don't need a xfmr, just
>stick a pair of 300 ohm resistors in series across the input of
>the M60 and ground the middle. If you think it sounds better,
>fair enough.Same goes for a balanced transmission line... then again, as you
know, it's hard to terminate a transmisson line because of the
inevitable imperfections of the source and receiver...In the end, it just depends on the performance *you* want...
Luis
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: MP3 and M60 MkII impedence match...... - Luis 10:34:05 07/21/00 (2)
- Re: MP3 and M60 MkII impedence match...... - John Harper 04:00:48 07/22/00 (1)
- Re: MP3 and M60 MkII impedence match...... - Luis 19:21:09 07/22/00 (0)