In Reply to: CCS for M60 driver stage? posted by John Harper on July 18, 1999 at 06:22:37:
This is something I've though about too. I'd be surprised it the improvement wasn't substantial. Now are
you ready for some blasphemy? Have you though about a sand based (pesky silicon based device)
solution? I'm beginning to question the sonic benefits of a thermionic CCS, especially when we're talking
a bit more current. The parts overhead is low and also very simple with a solid state CCS. If you believe
I've not trespassed in the land reserved for confirmed heretics, I'd appreciate your opinions.mark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: CCS for M60 driver stage? - mark gilmore 19:47:25 07/18/99 (4)
- Camille C4S - Phil Sieg 05:52:27 07/19/99 (2)
- Re: Camille C4S - mark gilmore 06:29:16 07/19/99 (1)
- Re: Camille C4S - Phil Sieg 06:39:34 07/19/99 (0)
- Re: CCS for M60 driver stage? - John Harper 04:17:39 07/19/99 (0)