In Reply to: What We Hear With DXD 32-bit Files (Free Sample Downloads) posted by Rushton on January 19, 2024 at 10:09:17:
After extended nearfield listening (6' equilateral triangle) to the Gounod tracks on the system listed below in an acoustically-treated 13'x11'x7'8" bedroom otherwise furnished as such, I hear enough of a difference in transparency to rank my listening preferences as follows:1. 32-bit 352.8
2. DSD256
3. 24-bit (dithered)
4. 24-bit (truncated, no dither)The 32-bit track sounds slightly more "open" than the DSD256 track. Although the latter may present as a tad "warmer," instruments are not quite as clearly delineated as in the 32-bit track. As a consequence, the rendering of space strikes me as ever-so-slightly compromised. I'd emphasize that the differences are slight. But they are noticeable.
To my ears, the 24-bit tracks suffer more severely in the comparison. But absent that comparison, I probably wouldn't have noticed.
Strictly a "to my ears on my system" FWIW.
Source: Aurender N150 Streamer/Server internal SSD
DAC: TEAC UD-505 (AKM version, 32-bit-capable)
Level Control: Luminous Audio Technology Walker-mod Axiom II passive
Amp: conrad-johnson MF2500
Speakers: Stand-mounted Paradigm Studio 20 v.5
USB feed: Shunyata Alpha
IC/Speaker Cable: WireWorld Eclipse 8
Power: Shunyata Delta D6, Alpha XC v.2, Delta NR v.2
Chassis Ground: Shunyata Altaira CG, Alpha and Venom cables
Acoustic Treatment: Stillpoints Aperture and GIK panels
Jim
Edits: 01/27/24
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: What We Hear With DXD 32-bit Files (Free Sample Downloads) - Jim Treanor 15:48:51 01/27/24 (1)
- Thanks for sharing what you hear - Rushton 13:39:19 01/28/24 (0)