1) Where did they get that collection of LPs covers with excessively worn spines?
2) Why are most of the LP cover spines LM (RCA LP Mono) instead of LSC (RCA Living Stereo)
3) And the most readable LP spine shown on the SACD spine is LM instead of LSC, why is this?I do not nor have I ever owned an LP with the type of worn spine and spinal damage as show on the front and back covers of the RCA Living Stereo SACDs.
If anyone knows why RCA did this please let me know. I love the inexpensive prices of the RCA Living Stereo SACDs and their excellent sound but why the worn ugly looking LPs making the SACD graphics look like amateur poor art? This has always puzzled me.
"Music is love"
Teresa
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - A couple of things bother me about the otherwise superb RCA Living Stereo SACDs: - Teresa 22:32:06 04/21/07 (11)
- Re: A couple of things bother me about the otherwise superb RCA Living Stereo SACDs: - Anton 14:09:42 04/25/07 (0)
- I've actually wondered about this myself... - Russell 19:16:52 04/23/07 (0)
- Friend, relax - docw 10:15:04 04/23/07 (1)
- Well mostly Telarcs but there are a few others I missed as well such as the David Chesky Concertos. - Teresa 20:19:13 04/23/07 (0)
- They do it specifically to annoy you, Teresa, ... - Jackaro 14:17:54 04/22/07 (0)
- Re: A couple of things bother me about the otherwise superb RCA Living Stereo SACDs: - Purdybird 13:00:54 04/22/07 (0)
- Teresa, you wouldn't understand--Beauty accepted with imperfection, paid for with wear and eventually eternal sleep.... - jdaniel 11:21:10 04/22/07 (0)
- perhaps - hifitommy 11:05:44 04/22/07 (0)
- Re: A couple of things bother me about the otherwise superb RCA Living Stereo SACDs: - Skeptic 08:46:04 04/22/07 (0)
- Could it visually imply ... - little help 05:38:47 04/22/07 (1)
- That could also explain the many "LM" covers as "LSC" are getting harder to find at used LP and thrift stores. - Teresa 19:18:16 04/22/07 (0)