I searched for this answer, but couldn't find the relevant discussion. Sorry to belabor it . . .This question arose when I was rummaging through RS albums at Best Buy today. Can one distinguish SACD hybrid vs. CD simply on the basis of digipack (SACD hybrid) vs. jewel case (the newly DSD remastered CDs)?
Said another way, are there any Rolling Stones issues from ABKCO in digipack form with a 2002 issue date that are not SACDs?
It's easy to distinguish newly issued DSD remastered CDs--they are clearly marked as such. I'm just not sure about SACDs, since there are no identification. Thanks.
townsend
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Rolling Stones SACD Hybrid vs. CD - townsend 17:12:04 10/01/06 (7)
- I've not listened to the DSD Remartered Discs - Tommart 18:28:30 10/04/06 (1)
- I meant "Remastered" nt - Tommart 18:29:51 10/04/06 (0)
- RS SACD Source - mcondo 11:15:05 10/02/06 (0)
- Re: Rolling Stones SACD Hybrid vs. CD - OvenBun 08:07:07 10/02/06 (0)
- Re: Rolling Stones SACD Hybrid vs. CD - Sb_caribou 05:35:16 10/02/06 (1)
- Re: Rolling Stones SACD Hybrid vs. CD - townsend 14:56:11 10/02/06 (0)
- Re: Rolling Stones SACD Hybrid vs. CD - Luciano,IT 03:57:48 10/02/06 (0)