68.6.143.128
'); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
This Post Has Been Edited by the Author
In Reply to: RE: REVIEW: Fournier HTA-1 Other posted by jaydacus on December 18, 2011 at 22:50:51
I took a quick look at my other stuff with tubes (monoblocks, preamp, phono, dac, hybrid integrated) but none are like the HTA-1 sockets. They have rounded top edges, concave slope toward the pin sockets, and the openings are seemingly pin-prick small at least for signal tubes. Impossible to misalign, easy to slide or rock in if needed. The HTA-1 has a flat top, wide openings, and requires a perfect alignment before pushing down. I haven't encountered anything like it before, and I admit I have had to perform some corrective re-straightening of bent stuff.
The HTA-1 is the 4th zero feedback amplifier I have owned. They are all special in that they present the full detail of ambient decay without truncation. But that occurs whether tube or solid state, so when I talk tube versus solid state I am using the generic stereotypical "dry vs wet" concepts.
Stuff I have used that have stereotypical tubyness:
EL34 monoblocks (tube)
300B monoblocks (tube)
Jolida integrated (hybrid mosfet/tube pre)
TAD Hibachi II monoblocks (solid state)
Stuff I have that is drier, "solid state sound":
Charlize Tripath (solid state)
Topping TP30 (solid state)
Fournier HTA-1 (hybrid mosfet/tube pre)
Stuff that is somewhat balanced:
Vintage 90s Rotel integrated (solid state)
The one thing that gives away a solid state amplifier, to me, is those sharp high frequencies.
I hope to have explained my personal reviewers biases a little better now.
Follow Ups: