In Reply to: Re: What is the origin of this recording? posted by azure on April 5, 2006 at 01:54:24:
So your opinion is worthless.I don't have to care about the original source.
The 'second rate material' sound quality is far better than the sa-cd.
and it's the original quad mix.We could argue about the actual mix as these are diffrent. I prefer the original quad mix.
For your information G. mixed in 24/96 pcm after the analog tapes where transferred to digital tracks.
The .1 channel is just an additional channel.
The other channels are not tampered with. So you're wrong about this.
(The center channel is used instead of the .1 channel.
This mistake isn't bothering me as my center channel is full range anyway. It can also be switched off.)Sour grapes indeed, paid for a lame (too conservative) mc mix from G. with the dsd sonic filter creating the typical tame, flat sa-cd sound.
Frank
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- So you did not hear it. - Frank.. 03:22:45 04/05/06 (7)
- Re: So you did not hear it. - Martin419 03:59:52 04/05/06 (6)
- Need to check that... - Frank.. 04:18:54 04/05/06 (5)
- Re: Need to check that... - azure 06:28:46 04/05/06 (4)
- I will survive - astolfo 12:40:28 04/05/06 (0)
- Re: Need to check that... - Martin419 06:32:15 04/05/06 (2)
- Wish You Were Here Quad Mix. - azure 23:50:58 04/05/06 (1)
- Re: Wish You Were Here Quad Mix. - downhill 04:25:31 04/06/06 (0)