|
DVD-Audiobahn New DVD-Audio music releases and talk about the latest players. |
|
|
|
DVD-Audiobahn New DVD-Audio music releases and talk about the latest players. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Thanks Martin for the info. Good job! posted by Max on September 7, 2005 at 20:17:58:
>> Why not just stay at 44.1k, though? All you are doing is wasting disk space. <<Not really. By increasing the "work-in-progress" resolution in BOTH axes, it makes for much better data interpolating possibilities, DSP operations and mixing etc. And with much smaller rounding errors.
An analogy: It gives the "artist" a bigger "canvas" on which to paint his picture with greater detail. And when this picture is subsequently scaled back down to, say, to fit onto an A4-sized magazine front cover, it looks so much more detailed compared with if he had originally painted it on an A4 sized canvas.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Not "wasting disc space" . . . - Martin419 03:55:19 09/08/05 (5)
- Re: Not "wasting disc space" . . . - Max 18:48:04 09/08/05 (4)
- Re: Not "wasting disc space" . . . - Martin419 05:40:00 09/09/05 (3)
- Re: Not "wasting disc space" . . . - Max 18:56:20 09/09/05 (2)
- Re: Not "wasting disc space" . . . - Martin419 02:33:41 09/10/05 (1)
- In this case, Max is absolutely 100% correct - Christine Tham 01:00:25 09/15/05 (1)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
